March 2010 edit

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mars. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Train2104 (talkcontribscount) 19:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

December 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mike Masters has been reverted, as it introduced negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be sourced to address the issue of libel. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 18:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page American Software Testing Qualifications Board has been reverted.
Your edit here to American Software Testing Qualifications Board was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://clarotesting.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/best-practice-or-just-okay-practice/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Notice edit

  Hello, I'm Pine. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Clearing house (finance) because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Pine 18:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Slon02 (talk) 21:20, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to A rolling stone gathers no moss because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Stesmo (talk) 22:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

- Your IP address shows you work at Barclays, if I were you I wouldn't make edits related to Barclays in future without declaring what your motive is.Gerard de Ridefort (talk) 09:15, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Operator873. Your recent edit to the page Curves International appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Operator873CONNECT 20:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ramakrishna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Jaellee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Joseph Ngwenya, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saint Patrick's Day, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Padgriffin. I noticed that in this edit to Kary Mullis, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 16:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply