Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

July 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Avaya Communication Manager, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Cgtdk (talk) 11:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Sunday Times Sportswomen of the Year Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:58, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

PeterConradiSundayTimes edit

I take it you are the same user? Could you please heed the COI warning I posted at your user talk? --John (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ricardo Montez because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The Banner talk 02:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Gardiner. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to Chris Gardiner was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WECQx7JdohQ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Dates edit

See WP:STRONGNAT: "Articles on topics with strong ties to a particular English-speaking country should generally use the more common date format for that nation. For the United States, this is month before day;"

We don't use European dates on biographical articles about Americans. Please don't revert my correction again. Yworo (talk) 18:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Yworo. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Amy Wallace, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Amy Wallace, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Please also note that WP:BLP also covers the recently deceased, generally for a year after death. Yworo (talk) 16:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Only if there is contentious information or information likely to upset the living. In this case there isn't.

Nope, you are wrong. If you don't provide sources when you add information, it will not stick. Source your additions, it's required by WP:V. Yworo (talk) 16:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
And I recommend that you create an account. Plenty of reasons to do so are provided on the linked page. Yworo (talk) 16:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Amy Wallace. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yworo (talk) 16:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Amy Wallace shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Yworo (talk) 16:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carla Connor may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Street with her husband, local factory owner, [[Paul Connor (Coronation Street)|Paul Connor]]). Her first husband, Paul, said in Carla's first scene that she was in [[Drug rehabilitation|rehab]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Mojoworker. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Prince Ernst of Hohenberg because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mojoworker (talk) 19:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sam Claflin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Samuel George Claflin was born on 27 June 1986)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.biography.com/people/sam-claflin-21044787 |title=Sam Claflin

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Chiranjeevi. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 16:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

RE: Brian Whelan edit

 
Hello, 143.252.80.100. You have new messages at Talk:Brian Whelan.
Message added -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 11:11, 7 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

April 2015 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Damián Martínez. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. QED237 (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eilat. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2015 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Jody Clark. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to Jody Clark was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/Er_Nope/status/615999424997818369) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2016 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Zavon Hines. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chip Foose, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Doherty (FootGolf) (February 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello! 143.252.80.100, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, 143.252.80.100. You have new messages at KylieTastic's talk page.
Message added 18:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

KylieTastic (talk) 18:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

August 2017 edit

  Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Michael Barrymore. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. PureRED (talk) 21:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Draft:Paul Doherty (FootGolf) concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Paul Doherty (FootGolf), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit to David Leppard edit

  Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (David Leppard), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! MrBill3 (talk) 17:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Paul Doherty (FootGolf) edit

 

Hello, 143.252.80.100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul Doherty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:34, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2018 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Allardyce. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 18:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2019 edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to List of people from Merseyside appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 12:11, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

February 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Glenn Murray have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 12:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm SleepForever. I noticed that you recently removed content from Devious licks without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SleepForever (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Georgie Kelly have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GiantSnowman 19:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Sun (United Kingdom), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Coronation of Charles III and Camilla edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Coronation of Charles III and Camilla, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply