12Dagge

Welcome!

Hello, 12Dagge! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 04:04, 22 March 2017 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2017

Hello, I'm McGeddon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Time Cube have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. McGeddon (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tobias Hübinette

The article Tobias Hübinette has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC with no secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 20:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black Lives Matter, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Last warning

Stop disruptively editing (i.e., putting in material at odds with the sources in an effort to distort or disparage). Neutrality^talk 23:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

When your article about Tobias H was deleted and you got a warning (section here under) I checked all your edits since you started here, and I think that you really need to think what you are doing on enwp. Neutrality warned you last August. I understand. Almost all of your edits have been reverted. Svenglish, bad sourcing or no source at all, own research et cetera. It is a wonder you are not blocked yet. If I had seen this from a user on svwp I would have blocked you at once, because the rest of the comunity should not have to check everything you do. Adville (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tobias Hübinette

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tobias Hübinette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RolandR (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add content or create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 20:35, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

Hi, 12Dagge. After taking a look at your editing in general, I have to agree with User:Adville's warning above. In view of the warnings on this page, and especially of the fact that you recreated Tobias Hübinette as a pure attack page after User:Neutrality's "final warning", I have blocked you indefinitely. I'm not saying your intentions are necessarily bad, but your editing on the English Wikipedia has been a net negative IMO, especially because of tendentious and/or unsourced additions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 21:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC).

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

12Dagge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Translate the Swedish wikipedia-page (here it is https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobias_Hübinette) and the Swedish wikiquote-page (https://sv.wikiquote.org/wiki/Tobias_Hübinette )about Tobias Hübinette in some translation program, and you will all understand that my page about him was not more of an attack-page than the pages that already excist there.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 22:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.