123.208.65.230

June 2022

Hello 123.208.65.230. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:123.208.65.230. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=123.208.65.230|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 15:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Honestly I have no idea or I wish to be related to them but I had only read an article about the financial stake of it that's all.123.208.65.230 (talk) 16:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

You read an article about "the financial stake" of Ramiz King? Sorry, that makes no sense – why would that lead to the creation of multiple drafts about the person, and the insertion of blatant advertising in other articles, such as here? --bonadea contributions talk 18:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Oh I was confused which article you were referring to ? also I MADEthose changes because the way you wrote it does not match the story line and I am a member to his YouTube and pay and have watch4d the premiere how I wrote is exactly the storyline? so I am rectifying it. 123.208.65.230 (talk) 19:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your changes are not constructive. Obviously I have read the sources, and obviously I wouldn't edit an article based on what I had seen on YouTube (neither can you! It is a fundamental principle). In addition, your changes added incoherent, nonsensical text, as well as bold text and other formatting that violate the Manual of Style – the text has been copyedited and you have reverted that copyediting, repeatedly.

Since your priority is to promote Ramiz King, you need to use edit requests on the article talk page, not edit it directly – and most importantly, do not edit war. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 19:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Please read the ABC NBews article completely and VICE to understand the storyline and what's even more better you can PAY on YouTube @MimRaOfficial to watch premiere and understand storyline! 123.208.65.230 (talk) 19:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at West Ta East, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 19:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

You have not read the articles nor watched the show? how can yo be so confident? 123.208.65.230 (talk) 19:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

I have raised a dispute, You're clearly ignoring the facts and sources I mentioned. 123.208.65.230 (talk) 20:08, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at West Ta East, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 06:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at West Ta East. Stop increasing the image size in the infobox.

And stop editing without logging in. bonadea contributions talk 15:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramiz King (June 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As before.

bonadea contributions talk 18:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, 123.208.65.230! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 18:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

---