112.205.179.117

September 2023

Hello, I'm Wesoree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2001 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 15:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

I was thinking about hatnotes and sections since the old ones, which is "Births and deaths" section has been removed or split since March 2023 RfC, according to WP:YEARS guideline. 112.205.179.117 (talk) 15:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1993. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 1993 was changed by 112.205.179.117 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923069 on 2023-09-21T00:51:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 1991, you may be blocked from editing. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

@CycloneYoris: It is against the consensus per March 2023 RfC, you can't just restore them. It's way too long "Births" section in year article that is "large" can be determined using the guidance at WP:SIZE and WP:SPLIT. There were strong arguments against removal, including needing to summarize the removed content (wherever it lands) per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE and it being preferable to have a tighter inclusion criteria than to just remove the births/deaths. 112.205.179.117 (talk) 04:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

---