109.171.194.161

February 2023

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User_Talk:Saintstephen000 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ckatz^talk 05:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 08:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, it is true that BLP edits may fall under 3RRNO if the material is contentious and unsourced or poorly sourced. But, really, rather than continually revert with this much material, you really should have discussed it on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 08:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

The user is biased toward information from cited and confirmed sources. Must be banned permanently GeorgeCrawford (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

---