Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Triton (moon) was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Double sharp (talk) 08:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

2016-2018

edit

Please note that despite the fact that most of your edits have had problems, (as partially explained before), there are definitely beneficial edits too. (e.g. [1], and four edits from 27 December 2018 that have WP:RS) Some things to work on:

(1) Use reliable sources
(2) Add WP:edit summaries to explain your edits.

--David Tornheim (talk) 10:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm David Tornheim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to St. Louis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. These edits are not beneficial to the article: [2], [3] --David Tornheim (talk) 09:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm David Tornheim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. This edit did not improve the article: [4] --David Tornheim (talk) 09:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm David Tornheim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to SummerSlam (2000) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. This edit did not match the data I found in reliable sources: [5]. --David Tornheim (talk) 09:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm David Tornheim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to CFR_Cluj have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. I believe your edits here were reverted. --David Tornheim (talk) 09:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm David Tornheim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of television series based on DC Comics have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Please note that another editor reverted your contributions to that article. --David Tornheim (talk) 10:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm David Tornheim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 1980 United States presidential election in Massachusetts have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. I reverted your edit which has no source. If you can find a source, we can put it back in. --David Tornheim (talk) 22:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Adam Lovell and WriteAPrisoner.com

edit

I reverted this edit because it does not have a reliable source. I did the same for this edit at WriteAPrisoner.com. Did you read about the re-do from a reliable source that you can provide? If it is just based on your personal knowledge, it does not belong in the article. --David Tornheim (talk) 10:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 27, 2018

edit

I have rolled back all of you recent edits that removed the IUCN designations. If you can explain why they are improvements to the articles, please let me know. I do not believe they need to be listed in the database to gain the designation.

I mentioned my concerns on the talk page of the editor who added the original designations to many of the articles in question. You can find my comments to him here: User_talk:Aymatth2#IUCN_designations_removed --David Tornheim (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

These are the edits I reverted:

  • 07:01, 27 December 2018 diff hist -21‎ Monge State Park ‎ -iucn cat, not listed in iucn database current [rollback: 1 edit] [rollback] [vandalism]
  • 06:59, 27 December 2018 diff hist -21‎ Mirador State Park ‎ -iucn cat, not listed in iucn database current [rollback: 1 edit] [rollback] [vandalism]
  • 06:57, 27 December 2018 diff hist -30‎ Maziwi Island ‎ -iucn cat, not listed in iucn database current [rollback: 1 edit] [rollback] [vandalism]
  • 06:56, 27 December 2018 diff hist -21‎ Matupiri State Park ‎ -iucn cat, cat "not reported" in iucn database current [rollback: 1 edit] [rollback] [vandalism]
  • 06:53, 27 December 2018 diff hist -44‎ Llogara Pass ‎ -iucn cat, not the park current [rollback: 1 edit] [rollback] [vandalism]
  • 06:45, 27 December 2018 diff hist -21‎ Ishango ‎ -iucn cat, not listed in iucn database current [rollback: 1 edit] [rollback] [vandalism]
  • 06:41, 27 December 2018 diff hist -44‎ Genko Forest Belt ‎ -iucn cat, not listed in iucn database current [rollback: 1 edit] [rollback] [vandalism]
  • 06:39, 27 December 2018 diff hist -21‎ Gangala-na-Bodio Elephant Domestication Center ‎ -iucn cat, not listed in iucn database current [rollback: 1 edit] [rollback] [vandalism]
  • 06:36, 27 December 2018 diff hist -29‎ Wildcat Mountain State Park ‎ -cat
  • 06:30, 27 December 2018 diff hist -30‎ Amaravathi Dam ‎ -iucn cat, not listed in iucn database
  • 06:12, 27 December 2018 diff hist -20‎ Rock Creek Park ‎ -iucn cat, not listed in iucn database

These edits look okay, because they are based on reliable sources:

--David Tornheim (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply