106.200.246.238

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Prithviraj (film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Prithviraj (film) was changed by 106.200.246.238 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880043 on 2022-01-27T07:16:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Prithviraj (film). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 16:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Prithviraj (film), you may be blocked from editing. BOVINEBOY2008 11:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hey!

I noticed you removed sourced content from Bachchan Pandey, and while you did give a reason as to why you removed it, I don't think the reasoning holds up (you stated that the film wasn't a remake, although the sources cited state it was). I would take further discussion to the article's talk page and explain your reasoning there. As the prose reads now, there's already some doubt shadowed upon the claim, and if you can provide sources that state it will not be a remake that will likely convince others. Thanks! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@106: Also, do not threaten to take action (legal or otherwise) against other editors, as you did here. Isabelle ^🔔 14:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Not meaning to pile on, but IP, you need to watch your language and tone in your edit summaries. Content disputes will happen, and using personal attacks like you did in your edit summary here [1] is not helpful. Please calmly discuss this on the article talk page, bringing sources to demonstrate support for your edit. The existing text is sourced. Ravensfire (talk) 00:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

---