104.181.85.104

July 2016

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sro23 (talk) 20:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

I wasn't doing that, my IP address changes on its own every few weeks.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sro23 (talk) 20:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

http://www.techradar.com/us/news/gaming/my-hopes-and-fears-for-paper-mario-color-splash-1316789 Here's the linked source.

I apologize for that. I didn't realize there was a 3 revert rule in place and I didn't notice that the links were from wikipedia instead of another article. I genuinely wasn't trying to vandalize or break rules.

I understand and I'm sorry for the confusion. I'm glad things worked out in the end. Sro23 (talk) 20:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

It's okay, I'm sorry too. Thanks.

January 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Incest. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 03:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

I can see that this IP address has a history of edit warring, as you are now doing at Sonic the Hedgehog (comics), where not one but two editors are reverting your inappropriate, POV edits. If you continue to revert, an admin will block or, given this IP's problematic history, possibly ban this IP from editing. Per WP:BRD, you are to take your concerns to the article's talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

You've violated WP:3RR and will be reported to an admin. I ask again that you begin a discussion on the article talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Because making the edit before seeing the warning and being punished for it is fair. I'm not going to continue because I don't want to be banned.

I will say however that the logic behind what I'm saying is sound. Other fictional media have non Human people that are treated as people in both the universe and by the fans of the series. Apparently it's an exception with Sonic despite him being created as a person since the start with having him planned to be with a Human girlfriend something they wouldn't have wanted to do if he had the mind/soul of/was an animal as that would be sick and wrong.

Whatever the case, I apologize for any trouble I caused. Even if the intention and reasons are sound going against the wiki policy isn't something that should be allowed to slide. I can be stubborn and passionate about things I care and feel strongly about so while it can be understood it still isn't okay to do and the logic behind the 3 revert rule is sound. Sorry for the trouble, I'll leave this page alone regardless of what changes it receives. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.181.85.104 (talk • contribs)

I can't revert your edit, since then I will be guilty of edit-warring, You need to do it, and since I'm nearly done inputting my evidence, I suggest you do it immediately. And then, take your concerns to the talk page and discuss your issue to try to reach consensus with other editors. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I have withdrawn the filing. Now please go to Talk:Sonic the Hedgehog (comics) to discuss your concerns. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, I'm ST47. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Intelligent design movement— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ST47 (talk) 02:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sweetness, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

Hello, I'm Megaman en m. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Emotion, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Megaman en m (talk) 20:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---