鳩山町に住むおじさん

Your repeated reversions of the article on "Haplogroup O-M176"

Mr. Middle-Aged Guy Who Lives in Hatoyama, please explain your reasons for repeatedly reverting the article on Haplogroup O-M176 to a very old version.

Can you present a valid reason to exclude recently published sources, such as Xianpeng Zhang et al. (2021), "Genomic Insight Into the Population Admixture History of Tungusic-Speaking Manchu People in Northeast China" or Monika Karmin et al. (2022), "Episodes of Diversification and Isolation in Island Southeast Asian and Near Oceanian Male Lineages" from the article?

I would appreciate a sincere reply. Ebizur (talk) 05:46, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Why do you try to distort the content you want by changing the content of the Manchurian people little by little? I don't care what nationality you are, and I respect everyone of any nationality. However, some people take what they think is bad and delete only the sources they want and distort the content. Do you do Wikipedia to erase what you hate? Please respect what others wrote. Even if the genes of Koreans and the genes of Manchus are similar, Koreans did not dominate the Chinese people. There's nothing to offend you.You were blocked and then unblocked because you also had an editorial dispute in the Japanese Wikipedia.Please respect the other person's opinion and edit it reasonably. Thank you.鳩山町に住むおじさん (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Adding data from new sources to a Wikipedia article does not constitute "distortion." You seem to have some obsession or attachment to figures from studies published nearly two decades ago. Why do you refuse to allow me or any other editor to update the article on Haplogroup O-M176 by adding recently published data?

Toru Katoh et al. 2005 ("Genetic features of Mongolian ethnic groups revealed by Y-chromosomal analysis") is just one of several published studies that have analyzed Y-DNA samples obtained from present-day Manchus. You seem to have a strong desire for the "real" proportion of Manchus who belong to haplogroup O1b2-M176 to be as high as indicated in the study by Katoh et al. 2005, but we may only reference published sources when editing Wikipedia; our own desires or imagined "reality" of the world are irrelevant. There is no valid reason to favor the results of Katoh et al. 2005 over the results of any other published study. Ebizur (talk) 06:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

You can respect previous studies and add new content.But no matter how new a theory exists, I hope you respect the existing one.I want it to be a neutral and reasonable edit. I don't want to argue with you any more.鳩山町に住むおじさん (talk) 06:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Then why did you change the order of the content? Why did you put the last thing you didn't like?鳩山町に住むおじさん (talk) 06:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

I have put the figures in order from smallest to largest, as that is the order in which all the other figures in the infobox have been put.

What is your IQ? Ebizur (talk) 06:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

It will be higher than you.鳩山町に住むおじさん (talk) 06:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

It is ridiculous to demand that I explain such simple, obvious facts to you whenever I make an addition to a Wikipedia article.

Frankly, you appear to be an obstinate dolt. Ebizur (talk) 06:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Please present precisely the data from Guo et al. 2015 that support the assertion that O-F940 may account for the Y-DNA of up to 4% of "Manchu Mongolians" and the data from Liu et al. 2013 that support the assertion that O-F940 may account for the Y-DNA of up to 4% of "Manchu Han." Ebizur (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)