Proposed deletion of Monosociality edit

 

The article Monosociality has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, dubious, non-notable term (lack of sourcing)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fifelfoo (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Kakute edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kakute, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dragonhoshidefense.com/about20.html. As a copyright violation, Kakute appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kakute has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Kakute and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Kakute with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kakute.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Fifelfoo (talk) 05:51, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Shikoro edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Shikoro, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://ninja-gear.com/Ninja_Tools.aspx. As a copyright violation, Shikoro appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Shikoro has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Shikoro and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Shikoro with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Shikoro.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Fifelfoo (talk) 05:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Seishinteki kyōyō edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Seishinteki kyōyō, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mardb.com/seishin-teki-kyoyo-spiritual-refinement/. As a copyright violation, Seishinteki kyōyō appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Seishinteki kyōyō has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Fifelfoo (talk) 05:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Immediate Action Unit edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Immediate Action Unit, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from google cache of: http://shadowspear.com/china-special-operations/immediate-action-unit.html. As a copyright violation, Immediate Action Unit appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Immediate Action Unit has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

Moshuh Nanren edit

Proposed deletion of Wikipedia edit

 

The article Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Moshuh Nanren is in clear copyright violation among other things.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RedSwordsman (talk) 20:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply


However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Fifelfoo (talk) 06:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nagamono edit

 

A tag has been placed on Nagamono, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gavin.perch (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of articles edit

I assumed you had been notified of this, but it appears not; my apologies. I'm just adding the one template here, but be advised that all the listed articles are up for deletion.

 

The article Angou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no references, it is one of many articles created by user:陳鬼 that are just one sentence articles based on a word taken from a martial arts web site, there is no research and it is just dumped on here, this is not what Wikipedia is about, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. See Kyuba, Nagamonojutsu, Nagamono, Torimono Dougu, Kakushi Buki Jutsu, Jouhou Kaishuu, Intonjutsu, Chikujou

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui  21:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Torimono Dougu for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Torimono Dougu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torimono Dougu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kyuba for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyuba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyuba until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 01:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kakushi Buki Jutsu for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kakushi Buki Jutsu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kakushi Buki Jutsu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 01:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jouhou Kaishuu for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jouhou Kaishuu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jouhou Kaishuu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 01:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Angou for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 01:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Heihou for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heihou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heihou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nagamonojutsu for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nagamonojutsu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagamonojutsu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 01:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chikujou for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chikujou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chikujou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 01:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply