用心阁
I see you edited Sarah Cahill's biography. However, your edit was incorrect, so I am reverting it. Sarah's father was not the New Jersey politician James M. Cahill. Reechard (talk) 02:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Images edit
Hi 用心阁! I noticed on your Flickr page that you have some really interesting and well-shot images about Beijing. I especially liked the images for the Tanzhe Temple, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bibubl/265765824/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bibubl/265764903/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bibubl/264971429/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bibubl/264971290/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bibubl/264971948/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bibubl/265765913/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bibubl/264972243/ which are hard to find on flickr. I noticed that the copyright labels on them are not the kind that's going to be acceptable on Wiki Commons, thus I was wondering if you could maybe upload some of them onto the Wiki Commons by yourself. These images are quite illustrative and informative and I would greatly appreciate if users can use them.--TheLeopard (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Platform Independent Petri Net Editor edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Platform Independent Petri Net Editor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- gtdp (T)/(C) 14:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S-RAMP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.