Warning January 2021 edit

I'm going to give you just one warning: you must not accuse other good-faith editors of vandalism without concrete evidence, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. I'm leaving this as a warning for now, because you are a new editor, but if you ever repeat that behaviour, I'll remove your editing privileges here. --RexxS (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your signature edit

Please consider WP:NLS. Alexbrn (talk) 08:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the link. I will now be informed ירמיהו - פרוגנוזה (talk) 10:17, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Test signature: ירמיהו - פרוגנוזה / lamentations

Nomination of Noogenesis for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noogenesis, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noogenesis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Noogenesis. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Sourced material *must actually be about the subject of the article*. If a source does not mention noogenesis, it really cannot be the basis of content for noogenesis. jps (talk) 12:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Aeremin per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aeremin. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply