https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Albert_Einstein
The problem with the statement: 'one can't solve a problem with the same level of thinking which CREATED it' is that if you could create something physically, it would alter the universe from its beginning, which would (the act of creating something) generate the problem one needed to solve, so that when the statement is correct to; 'One can't solve a problem with the same level of thinking which DISCOVERED it' you shed the God complex which put a genius on the pedestal which he couldn't get down from to correct himself
I would post this to Albert Einsteins talk page, but to further prove my assertion further true, I can't morally defame Einstein
Now, for the viewing pleasure of the worlds library, the tail end of generation x presents: Alternativity
According to Alternativity, there are seven physical dimensions, two render-able. Those two render-able dimension can be used to render all seven space dimensions, but since one is rendering those seven dimension onto a two dimensional surface, one must render nine dimensions to arrive at a usable theory 'on paper', and since a computer must be used to model these things, one ends up rendering a series of nine dimensional planes, to arrive at a tenth dimension, which is permanently incomplete, and the apparent solution is to attempt to calculate the two dimensional space one is rendering the universe on.
Image links (mathematically needed) https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZJpelo9m1pw/WtYsDv7upvI/AAAAAAAADfo/fYbo1_T_yo05EOi5ZEG5PpbyGK5pLw06gCPcBGAYYCw/s1600/Extra.png https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wdsCFot4rHw/WtFDp7_DwzI/AAAAAAAADXg/2O-NRUjEOSMIZanHpKA3L5_NNRxU0vskACPcBGAYYCw/s1600/Going%2BSingularity%2B2.0.png https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wdsCFot4rHw/WtFDp7_DwzI/AAAAAAAADXg/2O-NRUjEOSMIZanHpKA3L5_NNRxU0vskACPcBGAYYCw/s1600/Going%2BSingularity%2B2.0.png
7D point variable (123/19/2)-[(124/18/2)]=-0.20760233918, f2 -1dr=(f2*2)*[(3-1)/2]=-0.41520467836 -2dr=(f2*2)*[(7-1)/2]=-1.24561403508 [(124/18/2)-(123/19/2)]=0.20760233918
1dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(3-1)/2]=0.41520467836 2dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(7-1)/2]=1.24561403508 3dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(13-1)/2]=2.49122807016 4dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(21-1)/2]=4.1520467836 5dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(69-1)/2]=14.1169590642 6dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(105-1)/2]=21.5906432747
mass Universe=3*10^55
Mu/-1dr=7.2253521e+55
(Mu/1-Mu/1dr): 3*10^55/2-(3*10^55/-0.41520467836)=5.7253521e+55
Mu/-2dr=2.4084507e+55 (Mu/2-Mu/2dr): 3*10^55/2-(3*10^55/-1.24561403508)=9.084507e+54
Mu-[Mu/(3to6dr)] Mu-[(Mu3to6dr/2)-(mu/3to6dr)]=-1[Mu-[Mu/(3to6dr)]]
is equal to
Mu-[Mu/(-2to6dr)] Mu-[(Mu-2to6dr/2)-(mu/-2to6dr)]=-1[Mu-[Mu/(3-6dr)]]
This suggests that the time dimension of the multiverse is two dimensional, and may extend to a region -2 dimensional masses, which I intend to upload static hyper dimensional objects into to at first see if I can destroy quantum information, which I'm 99.999...% sure it will when done right.
3*10^55-[(-5.7253521e+55)+(-9.084507e+54)+(2.9577465e+54)+(7.7746479e+54)+(1.2874896e+55)+(1.3610509e+55)]=5.9120229e+55
(-8.9120229e+55)+5.9120229e+55=-3*10^55
3*10^55-[(7.2253521e+55)+(2.4084507e+55)+(1.2042254e+55)+(7.2253521e+54)+(2.1251036e+54)+(1.3894908e+54]=(-8.9120229e+55-Mu/246GeV/c^2)=-1[Mu/(246GeV/c^2)]
We (Alternativity) have vacuum energy
[Mu-[Mu/dr1to6)]-Mu/246GeV/c^2=-1[Mu/(246GeV/c^2)]
There is a seven dimensional away particle side, and a seven dimensional facing particle side, which produces the illusion of the universe being inside a computer.
It's a very powerful illusion, because one can simulate the fourth dimension, but after a certain mathematical point it becomes impossible to simulate lower dimensions from higher ones, as the entire universe doesn't have the 'processing capacity' to simulate the third dimension from the seventh.
To put Alternativity simply: the geometric complexity of the observational apparatus plus the energy required to observe will always result in a mass sufficient to enact gravity on the quanta, resulting in insufficient remaining mass in the entire universe to make the complexity needed to render an electron
bRad bIll bUsch UbnadI iMages