The COVID-19 pandemic topic is running into PEIS issues, which among other problems is causing citation display errors. The solution below illustrates mainspace article equivalent of COVID-19 pandemic data template transcluded in part into the Epidemiology section of this page. When transcluded, the reference column is removed and all references are replaced with a notice instructing the user to see the main data article for references. This approach builds upon the solution developed by User:Tenryuu. Table below transcluded from this article.
NOTE: ALL COUNTRIES CAN BE INCLUDED. LIMITED SUBSET WERE SELECTED FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES.
Epidemiology edit
|+ COVID-19 pandemic data by location
| Location[1][a] | Cases[b] | Deaths[c] | Recov.[d] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
World[e] | 676,609,955 | 6,881,955 | |
|
United States[f] | 3,834,208 | 142,601 | 1,117,084 |
|
Brazil[g] | 2,099,896 | 79,533 | 1,371,229 |
|
India | 33,766,707 | 448,339 | 33,043,144 |
|
Russia[h] | 771,546 | 12,342 | 550,344 |
|
South Africa | 364,328 | 5,033 | 191,059 |
|
Peru | 353,590 | 13,187 | 241,955 |
|
Mexico | 344,224 | 39,184 | 217,423 |
|
Chile[i] | 330,930 | 8,503 | 301,794 |
|
United Kingdom[j] | 294,792 | 45,318 | No data |
|
Iran | 273,788 | 14,188 | 237,788 |
|
Pakistan | 263,496 | 5,568 | 204,276 |
| As of 3 August 2020 (UTC) · History of cases · History of deaths | ||||
References
| ||||
Notes
| ||||
Background edit
On 31 December 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) got reports from health authorities in China of a cluster of viral pneumonia cases of unknown cause in Wuhan, Hubei,[345][346] and an investigation was launched at the start of January 2020.[347] On 30 January, the WHO declared the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)—7,818 cases confirmed globally, affecting 19 countries in five WHO regions.[348][7]
Several early infected people had visited Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market;[349] the virus is therefore thought to be of zoonotic origin.[350] The virus that caused the outbreak is known as SARS‑CoV‑2, a newly discovered virus closely related to bat coronaviruses,[351] pangolin coronaviruses,[352][353] and SARS-CoV.[354] The scientific consensus is that COVID-19 has a natural origin.[355][356] The probable bat-to-human infection may have been among people processing bat carcasses and guano in the production of traditional Chinese medicines.[357]
The earliest known person with symptoms was later discovered to have fallen ill on 1 December 2019, and that person did not have visible connections with the later wet market cluster.[358][359] Of the early cluster of cases reported that month, two-thirds were found to have a link with the market.[360][361][362] On 13 March 2020, an unverified report from the South China Morning Post suggested a case traced back to 17 November 2019 (a 55-year-old from Hubei) may have been the first person infected.[363][364]
The WHO recognised the spread of COVID-19 as a pandemic on 11 March 2020[8] as Italy, Iran, South Korea, and Japan reported surging cases. The total numbers outside China quickly surpassed China's.[365]
Cases edit
Official case counts refer to the number of people who have been tested for COVID-19 and whose test has been confirmed positive according to official protocols.[366] As of 24 May, countries that publicised their testing data have typically performed many tests equal to 2.6 percent of their population, while no country has tested samples equal to more than 17.3 percent of its population.[367] Many countries, early on, had official policies to not test those with only mild symptoms.[368][369] An analysis of the early phase of the outbreak up to 23 January estimated 86 percent of COVID-19 infections had not been detected, and that these undocumented infections were the source for 79 percent of documented cases.[370] Several other studies, using a variety of methods, have estimated that numbers of infections in many countries are likely to be considerably greater than the reported cases.[371][372]
On 9 April 2020, preliminary results found that 15 percent of people tested in Gangelt, the centre of a major infection cluster in Germany, tested positive for antibodies.[373] Screening for COVID-19 in pregnant women in New York City, and blood donors in the Netherlands, has also found rates of positive antibody tests that may indicate more infections than reported.[374][375] However, such antibody surveys can be unreliable due to a selection bias in who volunteers to take the tests, and due to false positives. Some results (such as the Gangelt study) have received substantial press coverage without first passing through peer review.[376]
Analysis by age in China indicates that a relatively low proportion of cases occur in individuals under 20.[377] It is not clear whether this is because young people are less likely to be infected, or less likely to develop serious symptoms and seek medical attention and be tested.[378] A retrospective cohort study in China found that children were as likely to be infected as adults.[379] Countries that test more, relative to the number of deaths, have a younger age distribution of cases, relative to the wider population.[380]