 | This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
User:Velela/sandbox
"Witty" citation spamming edit
User:Asw 65 hF8 4 edits all 24 July 2023 User:Mwitty - 45 edits from 18 July 2013 to 6 September 2018 User:ZjXu8910- 5 edits - 5 September 2023 User:GHtr6543 - 28 edits 3 August 2023 to 18 September 2023 User:HrSW u76tr -3 edits 12 June 2023
Banks Peninsula definition edit
https://teara.govt.nz/en/interactive/10293/canterburys-landforms - Ministry of Culture and Heritage - a simple map showing Banks Peninsula WaitahawaiwaterofCanterburysection4DiscoveringyourlocalwaterwayBanksPeninsulaHoromaka.PDF from ECAN url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecan.govt.nz%2Fdocument%2Fdownload%3Furi%3D1379504&usg=AOvVaw3s69G6fIS2-3fta6A88AaS provides a definition of Banks Peninsula including Lyttelton Much academic research takes the view that Banks Peninsula is comprised of the whole of the volcanic rock sequences such as https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274972191_Faulting_in_Banks_Peninsula_tectonic_setting_and_structural_controls_for_late_Miocene_intraplate_volcanism_New_Zealand Britannica includes Lyttleton within its definition - https://www.britannica.com/place/Banks-Peninsula It also includes a specific reference to the Heathcote valley being within the Banks Peninsula "The focus of this temblor was relatively shallow, however, occurring only 3 miles (5 km) beneath the surface of Heathcote Valley, a suburb of Christchurch located on the Banks Peninsula" - https://www.britannica.com/event/Christchurch-earthquakes-of-2010-2011 The Banks Peninsula landscape Study for Christchurch City Council in 2007 uses the boundary of the then subsumed Banks Peninsula District Council and puts the boundary along the crest of the Port Hills. - https://www.healthyharbour.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Boffa-Miskell-2007-Banks-Peninsula-Landscape-Study-Final-Report.pdf
Tags edit
To work on edit
Drinking-Water Standards for New Zealand: 2005 (DWSNZ 2005)
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Saltmarsh, Cleaveland & Gund, Bilzin Sumberg,Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, E-crowd,Kameelion , Fisher & Phillips, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, Kilpatrick Stockton, A. Eicoff & Company,Eicoff and co, A eicoff and co,Eicoff and company,Eicoff, A. Eicoff and Company, A Eicoff & Company ,A Eicoff ,Noel Turner (musician), Merus, Day Pitney,QT Talk, Arnstein & Lehr, Banner & Witcoff, Winston & Strawn, HMS69, ShNB Forex, Katten Muchin Rosenman,Joel James, Sardar Shaukat Ali Kashmiri , Asghar Ali Javed, McAndrews, Held & Malloy
List of Rust (fungus) species edit
Need to check current taxonomy Order Pucciniales / Uredinales
- Family Chaconiaceae
- Achrotelium'
- Aplopsora
- Botryorhiza
- Ceraceopsora
- Ceropsora
- Chaconia
- Chaconia africana -- syn Ypsilospora africana
- Chaconia alutacea
- Chaconia baphiae -- syn Ypsilospora baphiae
- Chaconia berroana
- Chaconia brasiliensis
- Chaconia braziliensis
- Chaconia butleri
- Chaconia coaetanea
- Chaconia ingae
- Goplana
- Maravalia
- Olivea
- Telomapea
- Family Coleosporiaceae
- Chrysomyxa
- Chrysomyxa abietis
- Chrysomyxa albida --Syn Kuehneola uredinis
- Chrysomyxa aliena
- Chrysomyxa alpina
- Chrysomyxa arctostaphyli
- Chrysomyxa bambusae --Syn Kweilingia bambusae
- Chrysomyxa bombacis
- Coleosporium
- Diaphanopellis
- Gallowaya
- Stilbechrysomyxa
- Chrysomyxa
- Family Cronartiaceae
- Family Melampsoraceae
- Family Mikronegeriaceae
- Family Phakopsoraceae
- Family Phragmidiaceae
- Family Pileolariaceae
- Family Pucciniaceae
- Chrysocyclus
- Chrysopsora
- Cleptomyces
- Coleopucciniella
- Corbulopsora
- Cumminsiella
- Cystopsora
- Endophyllum
- Gymnosporangium
- Kernella
- Miyagia
- Polioma
- Puccinia
- Puccinia angustata
- Puccinia arachidis
- Puccinia aristidae
- Puccinia asparagi--Asparagus rust
- Puccinia cacabata
- Puccinia campanulae
- Puccinia carthami
- Puccinia coronata
- Puccinia dioicae
- Puccinia erianthi
- Puccinia extensicola
- Puccinia graminis--Stem rust, black rust or cereal rust
- Puccinia helianthi
- Puccinia hordei
- Puccinia horiana--Chrysanthemum white rust
- Puccinia kuehnii
- Puccinia malvacearum
- Puccinia melanocephala
- Puccinia menthae
- Puccinia monoica
- Puccinia pelargonii-zonalis
- Puccinia phyllostachydis, Kusano
- Puccinia pittieriana
- Puccinia poarum --Coltsfoot rust gall
- Puccinia psidii--Guava rust or Eucalyptus rust
- Puccinia punctiformis
- Puccinia purpurea
- Puccinia recondita--Brown rust (of wheat)
- Puccinia schedonnardii
- Puccinia striiformis--Yellow rust (of wheat)
- Puccinia subnitens
- Puccinia substriata
- Puccinia thaliae
- Puccinia triticina--Wheat rust
- Puccinia urticata
- Puccinia verruca
- Puccinia xanthii
- Ramakrishnania
- Roestelia
- Stereostratum
- Uromyces
- Uromyces apiosporus
- Uromyces beticola
- Uromyces ciceris-arietini
- Uromyces dianthi
- Uromyces euphorbiae
- Uromyces graminis
- Uromyces inconspicuus
- Uromyces lineolatus subsp. nearcticus
- Uromyces medicaginis
- Uromyces musae
- Uromyces oblongus
- Uromyces pisi-sativi - syn: Uromyces pisi --Cypress Spurge
- Uromyces proëminens var. poinsettiae
- Uromyces transversalis--Gladiolus rust
- Uromyces trifolii-repentis var. fallens
- Uromyces viciae-fabae var. viciae-fabae
- Xenostele
- Zaghouania
- Family Pucciniosiraceae
- Family Pucciniastraceae
- Family Raveneliaceae
- Family Sphaerophragmiaceae
Reservoirs and lakes edit
- List of dams and reservoirs in the United Kingdom - a simple listing of artificial or dammed lakes in the whole of mainland Britain constructed for any purpose
- List of reservoirs in England and Wales by volume -a list by name, owner, location (County) when built , volume etc. One single dominant source which is odd since Environment Agency doesn't cover Wales
- List of lakes of England - includes reservoirs but for England only. Includes a table of the 7(?) largest by surface area. Unsortable list by local authority area
- Reservoirs of Wales an overview article including background information. Includes a table with images of some of the more notable reservoirs.
Unesco copy and paste edit
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2017_February_1#Articles_created_by_cut_and_paste_content_from_non_copyright_sources> see <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:Project/John_Cummings/Wikimedian_in_Residence_at_UNESCO_2017-2018/Final>.
sewage treatment process selection edit
Process selection edit
Many technical, environmental and economic factors affect the design of a sewage treatment plant and, with the exception of small rural works, each one will be designed to suit the particular conditions encountered..[1]: 215 Each design therefore depends on an analysis of all these factors to determine the optimum combination of processes to suit the expected range of loadings, both with regards to quality of the input, the required output standards and the maximum and minimum rates of flow expected. A life cycle assessment (LCA) can be used, with criteria or weightings attributed to the various aspects. This makes the final decision subjective to some extent.[1]: 216 A range of publications exist to help with technology selection.[1]: 221 [2][3][4]
In industrialized countries, the most important parameters in process selection are typically efficiency in both output quality and energy use, reliability, and space requirements. In developing countries, they might be different and the focus might be more on construction and operating costs as well as process simplicity.[1]: 218
Choosing the most suitable treatment process is complex because of the range of constraints and requirements. Where geography is appropriate a gravity sewerage system may feed the works which may allow a system driven largely by gravity such as trickling filters and a gravity effluent discharge. In low-lying areas energy costs may be more significant because of the need to pump sewage. Where land is expensive, the use of compact systems such as activated sludge processes may be indicated with thermophilic sludge digestion to reduce sludge volumes and generate biogas. The nature of the influent sewage also affects the choice of processes. A high strength and low-flow influent would require much more oxidative treatment capacity than a high flow strength influent, which might in turn require much larger settlement capacity. Highly variable strength and flow pose special difficulties in design and may indicate the need for duplicate process units that can be witched in or out depending on the prevailing influent composition.
Industrial processes in the catchment can contribute difficult to treat components which may require extended treatment or more specialized processes such a roughing filters, or polishing lagoon provision.
Where treatment plants are installed close to housing or work-places, odor control becomes a significant constraint, especially in sludge handling. Design requirements may include covered sludge processing units with active air extraction and treatment.
Automation of sewage treatment plants has reduced the size of the work-force need to keep the plant operational for many larger works in the developed world[5] treatment have resisted automation including managing issues such as sludge bulking, excess ragging in the influent, sludge transport off site etc. The need for expert personnel remains a constraint especially in high pay, low unemployment areas.
A textbook listed them as follows: "process applicability, applicable flow, acceptable flow variation, influent characteristics, inhibiting or refractory compounds, climatic aspects, process kinetics and reactor hydraulics, performance, treatment residuals, sludge processing, environmental constraints, chemical product requirements, energy requirements, requirements of other resources, personnel requirements, operating and maintenance requirements, ancillary processes, reliability, complexity, compatibility, area availability".[1]: 219
With regards to environmental impacts of sewage treatment plants the following aspects are included in the selection process: "Odors, vector attraction, sludge transportation, sanitary risks, air contamination, soil and subsoil contamination, surface water pollution or groundwater contamination, devaluation of nearby areas, inconvenience to the nearby population".[1]: 220
- ^ a b c d e f Cite error: The named reference
Marcos2was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
:04was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Spuhler, Dorothee; Germann, Verena; Kassa, Kinfe; Ketema, Atekelt Abebe; Sherpa, Anjali Manandhar; Sherpa, Mingma Gyalzen; Maurer, Max; Lüthi, Christoph; Langergraber, Guenter (2020). "Developing sanitation planning options: A tool for systematic consideration of novel technologies and systems". Journal of Environmental Management. 271: 111004. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111004. PMID 32778289. S2CID 221100596.
- ^ Spuhler, Dorothee; Scheidegger, Andreas; Maurer, Max (2020). "Comparative analysis of sanitation systems for resource recovery: Influence of configurations and single technology components". Water Research. 186: 116281. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116281. PMID 32949886. S2CID 221806742.
- ^ Haimi, Henri; Mulas, Michela; Vahala, Riku (October 2010). "Process automation in Wastewater Treatment Plants: the Finnish experience". E-WAter.