User:Sardanaphalus/Template:Infobox SCOTUS case/tests

New York v. Connecticut edit

Two-column (Infobox-like) layout edit

New York v. Connecticut
 
Original jurisdiction
Decided August 9, 1799
Full case name
The State of New-York v. The State of Connecticut, et al.
Citations4 U.S. 1 (more)
4 Dall. 1; 1 L. Ed. 715; 1799 U.S. LEXIS 243.
ClaimNew York moved to enjoin ejectment proceedings pending in a U.S. Circuit Court involving land over which New York and Connecticut claimed jurisdiction.
Procedural historyInjunction denied, 4 U.S. 1 (1799) (Ellsworth, C.J.)
Outcome
The State of New York was not a party to the ejectment action and had no interest at stake, because the Circuit Court lacked the power to determine its claim of rights over the disputed lands. Injunction denied.
Court membership
Case opinions
MajorityEllsworth, joined by Paterson, Chase, Washington
Cushing and Iredell took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
--------------- Categorization ---------------
-->{{#if:{{{SubmitDate|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{SubmitYear|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueDate|}}}     |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueYear|}}}     |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueDateA|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate|}}}   |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear|}}}   |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate2|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear2|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{DecideDate|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{DecideYear|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}

One-column (Sidebar-like) layout edit

New York v. Connecticut
 
Original jurisdiction
Decided August 9, 1799
Full case name
The State of New-York v. The State of Connecticut, et al.
Citations
4 U.S. 1 (more)
4 Dall. 1; 1 L. Ed. 715; 1799 U.S. LEXIS 243.
Claim
New York moved to enjoin ejectment proceedings pending in a U.S. Circuit Court involving land over which New York and Connecticut claimed jurisdiction.
Procedural history
Injunction denied, 4 U.S. 1 (1799) (Ellsworth, C.J.)
Outcome
The State of New York was not a party to the ejectment action and had no interest at stake, because the Circuit Court lacked the power to determine its claim of rights over the disputed lands. Injunction denied.
Court membership
[awaiting external template]
Case opinions
Majority
Ellsworth, joined by Paterson, Chase, Washington
Cushing and Iredell took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
--------------- Categorization ---------------
-->{{#if:{{{SubmitDate|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{SubmitYear|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueDate|}}}     |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueYear|}}}     |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueDateA|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate|}}}   |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear|}}}   |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate2|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear2|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{DecideDate|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{DecideYear|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}

Grutter v. Bollinger edit

Two-column (Infobox-like) layout edit

Grutter v. Bollinger
 
Argued April 1, 2003
Decided June 23, 2003
Full case name
Barbara Grutter, Petitioner v. Lee Bollinger, et al.
Citations539 U.S. 306 (more)
123 S.Ct. 2325, 156 L.Ed.2d 304, 71 USLW 4498, 91 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1761, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,415, 177 Ed. Law Rep. 801, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5378, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6800, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 367
Prior historyHeld for Plaintiff and enjoined use of current admissions policy, 137 F. Supp. 2d 821 (E.D. Mich. 2001); reversed, 288 F.3d 732 (6th Cir. 2002) (en banc); certiorari granted 537 U.S. 1043 (2002)
Subsequent historyRehearing denied, 539 U.S. 982 (2003)
Holding
University of Michigan Law School admissions program that gave special consideration for being a certain racial minority did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment.
Court membership
Case opinions
MajorityO'Connor, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
ConcurrenceGinsburg, joined by Breyer
Concur/dissentScalia, joined by Thomas
Concur/dissentThomas, joined by Scalia
DissentRehnquist, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
DissentKennedy
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
--------------- Categorization ---------------
-->{{#if:{{{SubmitDate|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{SubmitYear|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueDate|}}}     |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueYear|}}}     |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueDateA|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate|}}}   |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear|}}}   |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate2|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear2|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{DecideDate|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{DecideYear|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}

One-column (Sidebar-like) layout edit

Grutter v. Bollinger
 
Argued April 1, 2003
Decided June 23, 2003
Full case name
Barbara Grutter, Petitioner v. Lee Bollinger, et al.
Citations
539 U.S. 306 (more)
123 S.Ct. 2325, 156 L.Ed.2d 304, 71 USLW 4498, 91 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1761, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,415, 177 Ed. Law Rep. 801, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5378, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6800, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 367
Prior history
Held for Plaintiff and enjoined use of current admissions policy, 137 F. Supp. 2d 821 (E.D. Mich. 2001); reversed, 288 F.3d 732 (6th Cir. 2002) (en banc); certiorari granted 537 U.S. 1043 (2002)
Subsequent history
Rehearing denied, 539 U.S. 982 (2003)
Holding
University of Michigan Law School admissions program that gave special consideration for being a certain racial minority did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment.
Court membership
[awaiting external template]
Case opinions
Majority
O'Connor, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concurrence
Ginsburg, joined by Breyer
Concurrence/Dissent
Scalia, joined by Thomas
Concurrence/Dissent
Thomas, joined by Scalia
Dissent
Rehnquist, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
--------------- Categorization ---------------
-->{{#if:{{{SubmitDate|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{SubmitYear|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueDate|}}}     |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueYear|}}}     |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ArgueDateA|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate|}}}   |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear|}}}   |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate2|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear2|}}}  |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{DecideDate|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{DecideYear|}}}    |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}