User:Redwolf24/Archive27

Furry? edit

You're a furry? You're under the category furry wikipedians and I was just wondering, because it was just weird to see. Privat e Butcher 22:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

This one should be obvious... He's a wolf! Dragons flight 22:09, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Hermione1980's RfA edit

Thank you for your support on my RfA; I really appreciate it! I will do my best to live up to the trust you've shown in me. ::begins going down checklist of pages to move to "X on wheels!" No, wait a minute, I need something more original -- how about "X on bicycles"? (evil grin):: Thanks, H e rmione1980 23:15, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Dejame en paz edit

Mr. Redwolf24Why did you blank my page. I'm trying to be civil here and start something that I can occupy myself with. Why destroy it? Why don't you just leave me alone? I haven't vandalized and yet everybody's out to get me? YOU Leave ME Alone, let some other unbiased admin take care of it!!!--Blueballs 23:18, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

FIND ANOTHER SCAPEGOAT edit

YOU JUST HAVE A PERSONAL VENDETTA AGAINST ME! NO OTHER ADMIN WOULD DO TO MY PAGE WHAT YOU DID! LOOK MAN I LEFT YOU BUDDY NICK BUSH24 ALONE, NOW LEAVE ME THE *$## ALONE. YOU EVEN BLOCKED ME ONCE WITHOUT WARNING WHEN I JUST CHANGED THE COLOR OF THE STREETLIGHT FIXTURE. F OFF OK!--Blueballs 23:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Uhm. Yea. Aren't these supposed to come with a box of chocolates or flowers? «»Who ?¿?^meta 23:35, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

November edit

Do u think that this november comming up will be maybe one of the best month for RFAs as users such as GraemeL who I expect at least 100+ votes and maybe a record , JoanneB Jobe6 who im thinking of nominating in Early November V. Molotov and user MONGO who im planning of nominating in Mid November when he comes back from a 2 week vaction he said and BD2412 who I heard is planning to become a admin in LateNovember and whould clearly get 100+ votes in a snap and (few others that name is too long to type I think u know who) probaly become nominated and Accepeted --JAranda | watz sup 23:48, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

V. Molotov is an admin I believe. R e dwolf24 (talk) 23:52, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Nope something happened that got him pissed and he withdrew adminship . --JAranda | watz sup 23:57, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- And it's unlikely a new RfA for him would pass. His outbursts following his last RfA will be viewed in a rather negative light. Furthermore, he insists he's leaving the project. --Durin 14:22, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Also, we'll get a record for Acetic Acid (if he isn't already nominated by then) and our RfA friend Johann Wolfgang on November 1st by me and Essjay. --Cel e stianpower ^hablamé 09:09, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Sorry edit

Yes, this is one of my accounts related to User:Rainbowwarrior1977. I admit that User:Shelburne_Kismaayo and I are related somewhat, but I swear up and down that I have nothing at all to do with that User:Wiki_brah character. Do I seem like that guy at all? Shelburne was an obvious doppelganger, I know, but I don't think that Wiki_brah guy, whoever the hell he is, should be caught up in all this. I'm willing to accept my ban but I hate for innocents to be caught up in it. Anyway, I had even targetted Wiki_brah for a bit, along with User:Paul_Klenk, posing as User:TheDeletator, who I'm sure you know was also related to me. Why would I take the trouble to compose a Request for Comment against myself? It doesnt make sense. So please re-consider the block on User:Wiki_brah. You yourself believed him to be who he claimed to be, and who really could be that but him? I'm going to post the same on my pal Essjay's page and then be done with Wikipedia. I've caused enough problems for innocents. Sorry.Brandonfarb 01:06, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

My RfA edit

Thanks, Red, for your support of my RfA! I promise to do a good job using the keys to the janitor's closet. >: Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist • E@} 01:33, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Almost Forgot edit

Here Ya Go

Never gave one out for an RfB before, but whatever. Insert a comment about vandals here. Karmafist 06:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Tern: The Re-tern! edit

I'm not sure about all the details that lead to the blocking of Tern, but User:195.188.254.82 has admitted to being him, and claims to be editting from a library computer. I've blocked the IP for one hour; hopefully long enough to halt him and short enough to avoid inflicting collateral damage. Figured I'd give you the heads-up, as it seems he's been doing this for some time.--Scimitar ^parley 15:12, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

I believe it'd be okay for him to return as long as he stops whining about wikipedia and claiming we did him a harm, etc. If you see his talk page you'll see why he was blocked indefinitely, though he's not banned. R e dwolf24 (talk) 22:08, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Urine Tax edit

Please revisit the AfD/Article for Urine tax... it is WP:V. The article was factually inaccurate though. I've updated the article. Thanks!--Isotope23 00:41, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Done. R e dwolf24 (talk) 00:45, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Need you do to me a favor edit

Need you do to me a favor. This page Lauren 'Skeeter' Sirkin Im having a revert war with the creator of that article. It is nonsense and a A7 but the creator keep taking away the speedy tag. Could u delete it and protect that page. Thanks --JAranda | watz sup 01:45, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for getting rid of that junk. --JAranda | watz sup 01:51, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Transwiki edit

Hi Red, I went the rules on transwiking on meta, but its still somewhat confusing to me. When you close an afd debate that has a consensus to transwiki - do you delete the article afterwards? Also, how do you actually do the transwiki - just dump it in the Transwiki:ARTICLENAME? Or actually put it in the main namespace o f the wiki? Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 02:52, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Copy and paste to wt:Transwiki:ARTICLENAME or whatever source. The friendly people there will decide if they want it or not. Make sure you get the authors there too, maybe on a talk page... then delete the article here. R e dwolf24 (talk) 03:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 03:42, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

User:202.156.6.61 edit

Can I just check why you thought this user is a sockpuppet? Thanks! Am mainly wondering with regard to Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/The Whirlpool which they nominated. The Land 13:03, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

It's a sockpuppet of User:Omgwtflolz but that doesn't invalidate the AfD. R e dwolf24 (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

RfB edit

Looks like you bid to become a beaurocrat has failed(closed early). Sorry about that, but it looks like you need more time here in order to convice others that you can be promoted. In my opinion, you would make a fine beaurocrat, and I was not just voting based in "popularity". Oh well. Looks like my RfA might close early...yay!Voice of All ^{@|Esperanza|E M} 14:34, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

They only close early if it's clear they won't succeed, passing RfA's are never closed early. R e dwolf24 (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

MC edit

Oh NOES! I don't think the timing on that could have been worse.... yesterday was the roughest wikipedia day evar! I was burned out from working on Microsoft and the school debates. I don't blame people for thinking that I have "no clue of how to get along with people" or whatever after that, LOL. Maybe withdraw yet again and reapply later? Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 23:57, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Wow, three withdrawals. If you see fit, go ahead, and try in another month. R e dwolf24 (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Heads Up edit

Not sure if you're still interested, but it looks like Silverback has a meatpuppet in Silverbackman0076 (talk · contribs). I honestly don't have alot of confidence in the structured mediation process after what happened in the MC, Karyn/Kelly Martin's attitude of negativity towards WP:RFAr on IRC all the time even though she's on the Arbcom(she seems like she needs a vacation from there) , and most recently Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Pigsonthewing. Karmafist 03:46, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

So are you trying to say you're frustrated with the wiki? You're not alone. R e dwolf24 (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Admin edit

Hi Redwolf—I just looked at Kate's edit counter, and it's 2005 edits. It's a kinda ham-fisted way of assessing contribution—my count is probably inflated by my habit of forgetting to preview, and then returning to polish. On the other hand, sometimes I do huge edits in a single go. Your call. Cheers. Tony 04:45, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

I'll work on it pretty soon, Sunday at the latest. R e dwolf24 (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

JoanneB as possible admin edit

Hey Redwolf...I've recently taken a quick look at User:JoanneB for possible admin candidacy. I didn't do a thorough review, just checking talk page (looks very promising), time joined up (August), and number of edits (>4000). Due to the fact that she does so much vandal fighting, I suspect she'll get nominated long before she reaches the six month watermark I have for nominating people. I thought you might like to be aware of her in case you'd like to nominate her yourself. All the best, --Durin 17:49, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

She's an excellent candidate; I've been working with her all day in #wikipedia-en-vandalism. -- Essjay · Talk 18:33, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

JoanneB is gonna get over 80 supports, mark my words. R e dwolf24 (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Yes, and one of them is going to be from me! --Cel e stianpower ^hablamé 08:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Sorry edit

I'm sorry I didn't [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Private Butcher|listen]] to you. Privat e Butcher 18:49, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Bleh. R e dwolf24 (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Hi Matt! :) edit

Thank you! I noww totally undrestand your blocks and sorry that about bad people using my comments to jump on you like that but I am writing an article with Lucky 9.6 now so everrything is giong to be fine! Good morning thank you.!!!!Wiki brah 21:47, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

RfA, possible trolling? edit

boothy344 has voted no on every single RfA without explanation. This is not only suspesious, but against RfA guidlines. This is possible trolling warranting RfC. I wonder if the beaurocrates even count such silly votes. This is just ridiculous.Voice of All ^{@|Esperanza|E M} 21:52, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Boothy443 is known far and wide. He's not a troll however. R e dwolf24 (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

I might need your backup edit

BigDaddy777 used an IP address of 68.42.141.76 to get around the banishment. He posted to Rex071404's page. He is the only one who has ever used that IP so I banned it for a month. I don't think I'll see opposition, but if I do, I might need your backup. --Woohookitty 05:02, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

How is it that I was the one who blocked him indefinitely? It seems like someone should have a long time ago. R e dwolf24 (talk) 05:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Someone should have banned BigDaddy a long time ago, but the reason that didn't happen is complicated. BigDaddy's first major interaction was with Hipocrite[1]. BigDaddy's second major interaction was with Kizzle[2]. Both editors tried to persuade BigDaddy to follow the rules and failed. As did Numerous other editors. Then the RfC was filed[3]. Gator1[4] advised BigDaddy not to respond to that RfC and attempted to discredit the RfC in it's entirety. Paul Klenk[5] then butted in and attempted to prove that BigDaddy had "improved"[6] even though he completely ignored the RfC. First Kizzle's will wavered and he attempted to shut down the RfC[7], but Hipocrite objected. Later on Kizzle's will strengthened and he begun moving towards arbitration[8]. But then Hipocrite's will faltered. And then Kizzle decided everyone should just ignore BigDaddy and again attempted to shut down the RfC.[9]. At which point I stepped in and filed the RfAr. Then BigDaddy begun deleting other's comments left and right. And then RedWolf banned him. And you know the rest. Even after this whole sordid affair some users think BigDaddy wasn't "massaged" enough.[10]. - Mr. Tibbs 06:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

This story goes to show that Menaces like BigDaddy cannot be appeased and must be dealt with firmly. When the Carrot doesn't work, you Must use the Stick. - Mr. Tibbs 06:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Interesting story, but I know most of it, I was the one who blocked him afterall. And please call me Redwolf24 instead of RedWolf, RedWolf is a very senior admin with like 60,000 edits. I'm a different guy with a measly 10,000, yet we're both very well known. Point is, I'm not RedWolf ;-) R e dwolf24 (talk) 06:20, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

I Left out an important dialogue between Gator1 and other users on this subject: [11]. Here's another important dialogue involving Paul Klenk: [12]. Looking back there were several big mistakes in the handling of this other than firmness. Hipocrite and Kizzle's RfC excluding NPOV. Hipocrite and Kizzle both not keeping good track of BigDaddy, evidenced by Hipocrite missing BigDaddy's acts of vandalism. Multiple people allowing Paul Klenk and Gator1 to drag them into protracted arguements about BigDaddy. Oh well, 20/20 hindsight. - Mr. Tibbs 06:43, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Long time no see edit

...so have one of these,

Although I really need a long WikiBreak (my page is formatted to that theme). V. Molotov (talk)
05:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks V! Breaks can be good, provided you don't leave the wiki. R e dwolf24 (talk) 05:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

No problema, Red. V. Molotov (talk)
22:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Deja vu edit

*Essjay breathes life into an old tradition*

7000. -- Essjay · Talk 23:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

I need a favor edit

Could you my user page for a few hours as Im being attacked by annoying trolls and vandals that make me feel like quitting --JAranda | watz sup 01:43, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for protecting it I hope those annoying trolls go away now. I cant wait til November 21(the 3 month mark) when I let some one nominate or me nominate my self for admin so it could be perminaly protected and take care of those trolls --JAranda | watz sup 01:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Could you unprotect my user page now vandalism went away (I Hope) and need to place 2 Barnstars in my user page.Thanks anyways for the protection. --JAranda | watz sup 03:19, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Here it is edit

I heard you wanted to co-nom and Im doing this nomination early cause how active she was the last few days so here it is Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Purplefeltangel2 --JAranda | watz sup 02:27, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Not yet!!! Too early R e dwolf24 (talk) 02:40, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

O opps Oh,Well if it fails I will renominate in December but I don't think it will --JAranda | watz sup 02:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

NOOO! edit

DONT LEAVE, DONT FADE OUT!!! YOU'RE WANTED I SWAEAR! So I guess you weren't ready for Beaurocratship. You're an awesome editor, and noone can take that away from you, but I guess you need a little more time. No problem for such a great contributor such as yourself, but do us all a favor and don't fade out. Take a wikibreak if you need, but come back really soon, okay, please? (I'll e-mail you every day after a week if you dont....) -[[User:Mys e kurity|Mysekurity]] ^{[[additions | e-mail]]}_{03:05, 23 October 2005 (UTC)}

It's not the bureaucrat nomination, in fact that wasn't in my mind at all. It's just dissapointment with some parts and people of wikipedia. I'm not close to taking a break, but if you look at my edits lately you'll see I've been slowing, and hopefully this trend won't continue, but don't be surprised if it does. R e dwolf24 (talk) 03:07, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

erasing font color edit

In regards to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Travb#WP:RFM

Sorry, I am new to wikipedia, just this month.

I feel it is easier to read, but you are the bossTravb 03:58, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

One thing edit

I am about to go now but I have one questtion of you i fyou do not mind. What is a furry I am nott familiair with taht term tahnk you. Wiki brah 05:05, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

I don't really know either... ask User:Bushytails. R e dwolf24 (talk) 05:06, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Attack edit

Please can you deal with this as quickly as possible. It is a very damaging attack on myself and I am dumbfounded that you allow this to go on. Please remove.

Original Message -----

From: kategibbs To: info-en@wikimedia.org Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 11:18 PM Subject: TalK: List of Australians in International Prisons

Dear Sir/Madam

I am appalled at the way Wikipedia is used by people to launch personal attacks, which has recently happened to myself. Please see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Australians_in_international_prisons#Improvements_for_article

I was informed some time ago that people had been posting about me and the work I do at www.prisonersoverseas.com

I received an email this morning saying that whilst searching for Prisoners Overseas on Google using my name, the above came up in the listings. I have not been able to defend myself and the information is incorrect, including the fact I live in the UK, when I am based in Australia.It is in response to my setting up of Prisoners Overseas. This person has sought to blacken my name. There is a comment there from a Robert Frost of Prisoner Dispute in the UK, this is a fictitious name and fictitous organisation.

I have been accused of being someone called Diane Elgar, whom I am not. I would ask that this be investigated and removed. I made one post sometime ago in defense of Stephen Sutton whose listing was being vandalised.

This is a blatant personal attack which you state you do not allow, yet this has been on Wikipedia for some time now. This is effecting genuine charity work.

I wrote to you some time ago which was ignored. Please answer this letter and remove this appalling use of Wikipedia.

Regards

Kate Gibbons

--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 15/02/2005

My RfA edit

Thank you for your support - particularly for being so nice about me! I'm withdrawing, but hope someone will nominate me once a bit of time has gone by. The Land 18:32, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Derek Jeter arbitration edit

Looks like all parties have accepted. Please let me know if I need to do anything further. Thanks. --Nlu 19:20, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

AA's RFA edit

Hello! I took the liberty of answering the questions and accepting the nomination now, as I might not be on when you put it up. I didn't date anything though. I'm starting to get nervous. :P Thanks again for doing this. Ac e tic '^Acid 20:24, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Protection Alert edit

The Llama page is meeting heavy vandalism lately by a annon user. Could u protect it for a few hours. Thanks! --JAranda | watz sup 23:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

No. Don't protect pages due to one vandal. You warn the vandal a few times then block him, but you don't protect one page from one vandal. R e dwolf24 (talk) 23:26, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

I need you to protect my User Page as well as im in a labtop that is about to run out of battery and Hurricane Wilma took out the lights in my place for at least 3 days as I live in Miami so I cant edit at all period and all that late vandalism of my user page out of late is a consern. Thanks --JAranda | watz sup 21:36, 24 October 2005 (UTC)