This is list of opinions by the Supreme Court of the United States involving civil and criminal claims for securities fraud.
- Plaintiff must establish his reliance on the fraudulent statement.
- Section 10(b) does not impose liability for aiding and abetting in securities fraud commited by another.
United States v. O'Hagan, 521 U.S. 642 (1997)
|
Majority |
Author: Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
Joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer; Scalia in part
|
Holding:Criminal liability under section 10(b) may be predicated on the misappropriation theory.
|
|
Concurrence/dissent |
Author: Antonin Scalia
|
Scalia wrote that blah blah blah.
|
Concurrence/dissent |
Author: Clarence Thomas |
Joined by: Rehnquist
|
Thomas wrote that blah blah blah.
|
|
|
Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo, 544 U.S. 336 (2005)
|
Majority |
Author: Stephen Breyer |
Joined by: Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer, Ginsburg
|
Holding: Mere allegation that fraud artificially inflated price of stock did not satisfy loss causation requirement; plaintiffs must allege loss caused by market reaction to fraud.
|
|
|
|
Category:United States Supreme Court cases by subject
Category:United States securities case law