I just like explaining things to people. One of my favorite quotes is "If you find yourself alone, riding in green fields with the Sun on your face, do not be troubled for you are in Elysium and you are already dead."
I am a Libertarian, capitalist, and lean right-wing. I think Wikipedia could do with more neutrality, so I try to edit out biased language wherever I see it, or bring it up in the article's talk page. I am an inclusionist.
Y'know, I've been thinking recently, and something I've realized is that Wikipedia's implementation of neutral point of view is a kind of bias in its own right. Since Wikipedia only allows popular, "reliable" sources that are agreed upon in general, then any manipulation of the sources at large would result in a manipulation of what Wikipedia posts, preventing the proper presentation of neutral facts. As our co-founder Larry Sanger once said, "The left, frankly, is relentless when it comes to stating their point of view and using the organs of mass media—and Wikipedia is part of their mass media I think—to shape the world", "And so it became another one of the institutions that they had to capture." I wish I knew how this could be avoided, for it deeply disconcerts me.