Evaluate an article edit
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Information Age
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article because the shift from industrial age to the age of technology and information is really interesting to me.
Lead edit
- Guiding questions
The Information Age (also known as the Computer Age, Digital Age, or New Media Age) is a historic period in the 21st century characterized by the rapid shift from traditional industry that the Industrial Revolution brought through industrialization, to an economy based on information technology.[citation needed] The onset of the Information Age can be associated with the invention of the transistor, particularly the MOSFET (metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor), which revolutionized modern technology and became the fundamental building block of digital electronics in the information age.
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
Lead evaluation edit
The lead for the article is concise and clear but has no citation for the first sentence. The lead does not have a description of the major sections. Everything in the lead is in the article. The lead is overly detailed with no information about what the article is about and some added information that is talked about later in great detail later on .
Content edit
- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- Is the content up-to-date?
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Content evaluation edit
The content of the article is very relevant to the topic. The content is up-to-date. There were a few spots were I found that a citation was needed.
Tone and Balance edit
- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral?
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation edit
The article reads neutral to me. All the claims seem neutral and just read as facts and numbers. I did not feel persuaded at all during the article.
Sources and References edit
- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Are the sources current?
- Check a few links. Do they work?
Sources and references evaluation edit
Excluding one or two sections in the article that were missing citations, all the facts were backed up with citations. Most of the sources are within the last 20 years so I would put that as pretty current. The first couple of links I clicked did not work but then all the others one did.
Organization edit
- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
Organization evaluation edit
The article does seem well-written. Points seem concise and organized.
Images and Media edit
- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation edit
There was only one image for the article and it does not really relate to the article.
Checking the talk page edit
- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
Talk page evaluation edit
Most of the discussion going on in the talk tab is about a merge with other articles of the same topics. Every talk post has information backing up the claim in the talk post.
Overall impressions edit
- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status?
- What are the article's strengths?
- How can the article be improved?
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
Overall evaluation edit
The article has a lot of strong facts and numbers that are cited and concise. The article could use more pictures that help get the message across with all the facts. I would say that this article almost complete just missing some citing and more pictures
Optional activity edit
- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback:
 | This is a user sandbox of NewtJersey. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |