 | This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
New article name new article content ...
References edit
External links edit
There isn't a fair balance of Sri Lankan women authors on wikipedia. Despite notable criteria outlined by wikipedia being met by Sri Lankan authors to warrant inclusion, wikipedia cannot understand to do proper research on these subjects or are unwilling to give them the same credit they may extend to other authors not of international origin but of interest to them. The system becomes even more flawed when editors and administrators are too busy to do due research on a subjects brought forward for inclusion and are extremely eager to delete the article off if they don't understand it or have no interest in it. Meeting all the wikipedia critiria in the world is not good enough if administrators do not wish to see facts and dismiss valid arguments. For example a wikipedia criteria may state "many books used as textbooks in a range of universities may meet notability" So, you show that there are many books in many renowned universities. One administrator who just cannot be bothered with the articles will add "not notable". How frustrating is that? It meets the wording of the notability criteria outlined by wikipedia itself. Then you show mainstream media articles written by reputable third party journalists. If it is a renowned forein newspaper it is disregarded. Why? They are not bothered enough to call the newspapers or check the archives but rapidly delete the subject claiming "made up article" or "unreliable and not verifiable".
Wikipedia has grown too large to be objective or to take the time to research a subject before being quick to cast insults. Administrators and some editors boast of stars and awards in the hidden and unidentified world of wikipedia where their poor research skills and arrogance brings forward an encyclopedia based on their interests and self fulfilment rather than giving true credit to facts and notable figures.