"The Engineering Economist" article is structured so that reaching information can be easy. The wiki article does have a lot of content gaps because when engineering economy is broken up into subdivisions such as Energy Research and Social Science, Engineering Geology, ect..., many of those links did not work. This may be true but the way the information can be accessed is fairly easy. The way to remedy this is to just have the pages edited and the content to be edited by a professional of that field( Professional engineer). When it comes to providing informative content, there must be a responsibility to the content provider to have a certain amount of knowledge that is widely accepted and accurate.So only professional engineers should only be the ones allowed to provide the content for the missing pages, this is to decline the possibility of having inaccurate content for the public.~~~~