What the heck is going on here?
Hi there: if you're not Mononomic, none of this will probably make any sense to you. I'm just making a to-do list for my upcoming work on the Ansel Adams article.
A complete guide to criteria for a Good Article is available here.
Mine edit
- Correct grammar and spelling, style
- Comply with MOS for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
- Properly format refs
- Began converting to shortened footnotes using the Srn template. Mono·nomic 01:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Add sources if necessary
- Good images, with proper FURs if needed, image descriptions, all preferably free
Finetooth edit
From Wikipedia:Peer review/Ansel Adams/archive1 by User:Finetooth. Not directly quoted, but summarized.
- Paraphrase instead of quotes, especially for short ones
- Note explaining lack of images due to copyright restrictions
Justify fair useNo more fair use pictures! —Mono·nomic 15:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Move pictures around (see original)—Mono·nomic 22:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)- Cut down Career section
- Maybe break up into "20s and 30s", "40s and 50s", "60s and later"
- Rewrite lead at end of editing
- Must mention youth, family, interest in music, publications, awards, legacy.
Convert to prose (per MOS) for lists in Awards, but not Works—Mono·nomic 22:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Em --> en dashes in notes—Mono·nomic 21:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Alt texts—Mono·nomic 23:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Disambiguate—Mono·nomic 21:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)- Make sure I didn't miss anything from original list