Well to answer your question. Absolutely. Professor Hill is a very kind and professional person (at least in my few interactions with him). Here is what info I used when I first created a bio page on him before Wikipedia deleted the page as copyright infringement. [1] If you need anymore info he will actually talk to you if you email him. He is actual quite humble and willing (it seems/seemed) to talk to anyone interested in an honest understanding of history. Who knows he might not be so now though. Him and/like Mary Lefkowitz are attacked on a regular basis so he might be alittle gunshy. As for why Wikipedia should contain a article on Chuck Hill. The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church By Charles E. Hill[2] is a direct apology to the Orthodox Johannophobia paradigm called OJP read this review for clarification [3]. As doing so it has become a defintive work for apologists against some of the staples of inaccuracies of second centry christian history.
God Bless LoveMonkey (talk) 12:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Professor of New Testament at the Reformed Theological Seminary is a reliable scholar from a reliable institution in academic terms, let alone Wiki terms (which admit almost any publication). Please, please, please write up a bio for Professor Hill, though you will need to call him Charles E Hill or Hill, not Chuck or Professor (no titles in academic writing or at Wiki). Glad you two are onto this.
RTS board, staff and students trust and teach many things I also trust. One of my favourite sources of quality Christian thinking. Alastair Haines (talk) 02:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)