I have primarily written and contributed to chess-related articles in Wikipedia. I am particularly proud of my articles First-move advantage in chess, George H. D. Gossip, and Swindle (chess). The first two of these have been promoted to Featured Article, the highest rating on Wikipedia. Only about 2,700 of the 3.1 million articles in the English Wikipedia are Featured Articles. Of almost 4,100 chess-related articles on Wikipedia, these are two of only four Featured Articles. They appeared as Today's Featured Article on the Main Page of Wikipedia on March 21 and December 6, 2009. Only about one out of every 1,400 articles ever becomes Today's Featured Article.
It is impossible not to have misgivings, both general and particular, about Wikipedia, but we have recently noticed a great improvement in some of the chess articles in the site’s English-language version. There is, for instance, excellent treatment of G.H.D. Gossip, and it is also good to see a fine article on Hugh Myers.
My aunt, Frances Olsen, is the subject of a Wikipedia article, as is one of my law school roommates, Rockard Delgadillo, and Ron Klain, the husband of another of my law school roommates. As a lawyer, I met Barack Obama back before he held any political office, and have shaken his hand on five occasions. I have a Morphy Number of 4 (many grandmasters today have one of 5), having drawn a game online against Leonard Barden, one of the few living players with a Morphy Number of 3. I have a better record against Viktors Pupols (one draw) than Bobby Fischer (one loss) did.
My Wikipedia handle "Krakatoa" actually refers to chess, not the famous volcano that is west of Java, contrary to the mistitled 1969 movie. Particularly when playing speed chess, certain players <cough>Marvin Dandridge<cough> have been known to exclaim that they are "cracking" their opponent (i.e. have secured a winning position, especially in the form of a decisive mating attack against the enemy king). Someone (maybe even me, I don't remember) adapted this into the exclamation "Krakatoa!"
The endgame study immediately below was not (unfortunately) composed by me, but by Mitrofanov. It is a corrected version of his original problem, which won first prize in the 1967 Rustaveli tournament. That problem had Black'sknight on f3 instead of g2 (see algebraic notation), but turned out to have a cook. I bring it to your attention because I was so amazed and impressed by it. White, on move, is to play and win. The solution is here.
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
Below is a study that I composed in 2005. It was published in "Benko's Bafflers" in the May2006 issue of Chess Lifemagazine. It is based on a simpler study that I composed in 2001, which was also published in "Benko's Bafflers." (In the earlier problem, there are no knights on c5 or d3, White's rook is on h1 rather than h4, and Black's bishop is on e5 rather than d6.) White, on move, is to play and force a draw. The solution is here.
Below is a game I won against David Sprenkle (Black) in 1982. Chess Informant, volume 32, published it with my annotations. In volume 33, it was voted the 8th-9th most theoretically important game in volume 32. Larsen ranked it first, and Byrne ranked it second. It was also cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings and Modern Chess Openings, and occupies a whole chapter in all three editions of Nunn’s book "Beating the Sicilian." See John Nunn, Beating the Sicilian, American Chess Promotions, 1984, pp. 130-35, ISBN0-7134-0899-5; John Nunn, Beating the Sicilian II: A Complete New Repertoire for White, Batsford, 1990, pp. 149-54, ISBN0-7134-6445-3; John Nunn and Joe Gallagher, Beating the Sicilian 3, Henry Holt and Company, 1995, pp. 200-05. ISBN0-8050-4227-X. You can play over the game on the chessgames.comwebsite, or play over all three of the below games starting from here.
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
Rhine-Sprenkle, after 27...Rd8
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6!? Introducing the razor-sharp Nimzowitsch Variation of the Sicilian Defense. 3.e5! Nd5 4.Nc3 e6 5.Nxd5 exd5 6.d4 Nc6 7.dxc5 Bxc5 8.Qxd5 Qb6 9.Bc4 Bxf2+ 10.Ke2 O-O 11.Rf1 Bc5 12.Ng5 Nd4+ 13.Kd1 Ne6 14.Ne4 d6 15.exd6 Rd8 16.Bd3 Bxd6 17.Qh5 f5 18.Nxd6! An important theoretical novelty at the time, this is now considered the main line. As I write this in February 2015, ChessBase Online shows that White scores over 75% with 18.Nxd6! Qxd6 19.Qxf5 Qxh2Minić later drew against Short with 19...Nf8!?20.Qf7+ Kh8 21.Bg5! Rg8 22.Be3! Nd8!? 23.Qf2 23.Qf4! is better. Nc6! 24.Kd2 Qd6? 24...Ne5! and if 25.Rh1 Nxd3! comes close to equalizing. Now White has a winning attack. 25.Rh1 h6 26.Bc5!+- driving the queen away so that White can play Qf4 or Qe3, with the crushing threat of Rxh6+ Qd5 26...Qc7 27.Qf6!! gxf6 (otherwise Rxh6+) 28.Rxh6+ Kg7 29.Rh7# 27.Qf4! Rd8 (see diagram at left) If 27...Qxg2+, 28.Kc3. 28.Rxh6+! Kg8 28...gxh6 29.Qxh6+ Kg8 30.Qh7# 29.Rh8+! Kxh8 30.Qh4+ Kg8 31.Qh7+ Kf7 32.Qg6+ Kg8 33.Qh7+ Kf7 34.Rf1+ Bf5 35.Rxf5+ Qxf5 36.Qxf5+ Kg8 37.Kc1 1-0
Below is a correspondence game I played against Kyle Thompson (White) in 1992. Chess Informant, volume 57, published it with my annotations. It was also cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings, and was chessgames.com's Game of the Day on December 14, 2010. You can play it over here.
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
Thompson-Rhine, position after 26.Re5??
1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.f4 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Bc4 e6 6.f5 White is playing the hyper-aggressive Grand Prix Attack against my Sicilian. Nge7 7.fxe6 fxe6 8.d3 d5 9.Bb3 b5! 10.exd5 exd5 11.0-0 a well-known line entailing a piece sacrifice by White Bxc3!? 10...c4! 11.dxc4 dxc4 12.Qxd8+ Nxd8! 13.Nxb5 cxb3! 14.Nc7+ Kd7 15.Nxa8 bxc2! was later shown to favor Black. 12.bxc3 c4 13.Ng5 Bf5 14.dxc4 dxc4 15.Qe2 cxb3 16.axb3 Qd5 17.Ba3 b4 18.cxb4!? theoretical novelty Nd4 19.Qf2 Nxc2! 20.Bb2 0-0! 21.Nxh7!? Kxh7 22.Ra5? Qd3!!-+ Since this was a correspondence game, I was able to spend many hours analyzing this position to a forced win in all lines. 23.Qh4+ Kg8 24.Qh8+ Kf7 25.Qg7+ Ke8 26.Re5?? (see diagram at left) One of the main points of the centralizing 22...Qd3!!, rather than the more natural 22...Qxb3, was that it prevented this move! Qxf1+! 27.Kxf1 Bd3++ 28.Kg1 Rf1#
I played the following correspondence game against against Antonie Boerkoel (Black) in the 1995Golden Knightssemifinals. Boerkoel played like a tacticalgenius, sacrificing, or offering to sacrifice, literally every kind of piece possible except his king -- pawn, knight, bishop, rook, and queen. You can play it over here.
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
Rhine-Boerkoel, position after 23.Qb3: Black initiates a sacrificial orgy.
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5 7.0-0 Nc6 8.d5 Ne7 9.b4 Nh5 10.Rel f5 11.Ng5 Nf4 12.Bxf4 exf4 13.Rc1 Kh8 14.Bf3 Be5 15.c5 c6!? theoretical novelty 16.exf5 Nxf5 17.dxc6 Qxg5 18.cxb7 Bxb7 19.Bxb7 Rab8 20.Ne4 Qh4 21.Ba6 dxc5 22.bxc5 Rbd8 23.Qb3 (see diagram at left) Ne3!! Threatening to win with either 24...Nxg2! 25.Kxg2 f3+ or 24...f3! 25.g3 Qh3 26.Bf1 Nxf1. 24.g3 If 24.fxe3, f3 with the triple threats of Qxh2+, Qxe4, and f2+ is strong. 24...fxg3 25.hxg3 Rxf2!! Now Black's knight, rook, and queen are all hanging. 26.Kxf2 If 26.gxh4, Rg2+ 27.Kh1 Rh2+ draws by perpetual check. If 26.Qxe3??, Qh2#. And if 26.Nxf2??, Qxg3+ and mate next. 26...Bxg3+!= 27.Nxg3 Forced. If 27.Kxe3??, Qf4+ 28.Ke2 Qxe4+ 29.Kf1 (or 29.Qe3 Qg2+) Qh1+ 30.Ke2 Qg2+ 31.Ke3 Qf2+ 32.Ke4 Qf4#. 27.Ke2?? Qg4+ 28.Kxe3 Qf4+ is the same. 27...Qf4+ 28.Ke2 28.Kg1?? Qxg3+ and mate next 28...Qg4+ 29.Kxe3 Qxg3+ 30.Ke2 Qg2+ 31.Ke3 Qg3+ 32.Ke4 Qg4+ 31.Ke3! 31.Ke5?? Qf5# 1/2-1/2 A brilliant game by Boerkoel. Who says draws have to be boring?
I later found the following grandmaster game, which has strikingly similar tactical ideas to those in Rhine-Boerkoel: Westerinen-Sakaev, Gausdal 1992 1. e4 2.c5 2.Nc3 e6 3.Nge2 d6 4.g3 Nc6 5.Bg2 Nf6 6.0-0 Be7 7.h3 0-0 8.d3 Rb8 9.f4 d5 10.exd5 exd5 11.f5 d4 12.Ne4 Nxe4 13.Bxe4 Bd6 14.Nf4 Ne5 15.Qh5 Re8 16.Ne6!! g6! 17.fxg6 hxg6 18.Rxf7! 1/2-1/2 You can play it over here
For many fine contributions to chess topics. Bubba73(talk), 23:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
The Content Creativity Barnstar
For the tremendous work and material you put in the article First-move advantage in chess so that it reached A-class, I award you this barnstar. SyG (talk) 08:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
The Half Barnstar
For the great work Philcha (a British) and Krakatoa (an American) were able to produce together in order to reach a neutral point-of-view in the article Howard Staunton so that it reached GA-class, I award to each of them half of this barnstar. SyG (talk) 08:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For numerous quality contributions to chess topics. SunCreator (talk) 16:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
You are the first Wikipedian ever to be awarded the Chess Barnstar !!edit
The Chess Barnstar
For having brought once again a chess article, George H. D. Gossip, first to FA-class then on the Main Page, I award you this Chess Barnstar. Thank you so much ! SyG (talk) 15:42, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar
In recognition of continued steady work on our chess articles, particularly a large number of minor edits that combine to form a major contribution. RomanSpa (talk) 09:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
