If anyone else takes a look here, note that these are not necessarily correct; there seems to be something wrong with my derivations, which is why I'm poking around here.

edit

My derivations

edit
 
 
 
  - no guarantee over this, or that the   here is the one equal to  .
 
 

Old A

edit
  - but see Weisstein's section below and New A section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

New A

edit

Repeats

edit
 
 
 
  - no guarantee over this, or that the   here is the one equal to  .
 
 

Reformulation

edit
  - see Weisstein's section below
 
 
 
 
 
 

Damn, the different area formula is making things even worse?!? Maybe it's the definition of   that's not what I'd expect? It needn't be the mass-energy equivalence of the entire mass of the black hole.

 
  - Why this apparent equivalence? I have no idea. It could also be that  .

Let's try a comparison with the gravitational binding energy formula. I doubt it has any relevance, but I'll see what it generates.

  - Well, it's in the ballpark, and I'm pretty sure that binding energy formula doesn't allow for relativistic effects. But I still don't think it has anything to do with it.

Continued: emission

edit
Using my new S & T
edit
 
 
 
 
 
 
Using their S & T
edit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

as in article

edit
  (natural units)
 
 
 

examples in article

edit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

derivations

edit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Odd, it does come out the same as the usual formula as surface area of a sphere. My mistake must lie elsewhere.

compared to my derivations

edit
 
 

For some reason,   is coming out twice as large as  . It naturally follows that this would lead to   being 16 times larger than  . I thought event horizons might have a surface area that was not equal to that of a conventional sphere, but that doesn't seem to explain it.

as in article

edit
 
 

(was Black hole entropy)

as in article

edit
 
 

(was Laws of black hole mechanics)

as in article

edit
  (natural units)
  (natural units)

as in article

edit

I noticed this in the table of equations with their nondimensionalized equivalents:

Thermal energy per particle per degree of freedom
 

This may be the key, if it's half of  , much like   threw me off with that half, when I was very young.

derivations

edit
 
 ,  ,  

as in article

edit
 
 

as in article

edit
 
  - Here's where it's different! That's not the formula for an undistorted sphere.
 

Black Hole Radiation and Volume Statistical Entropy by Mario Rabinowitz

edit

as in article

edit
 
 
 
 
 

Examples

edit

SI units

edit

Solar-mass black hole

edit
 
 
 
  or  
 
 
 
 
  or  
 
 

1-second black hole

edit
 
 
 
  or  
 
 
 
  or  
 
 
 
 
 

Solar-mass black hole

edit
 
 
 
  or  
 
 
 
  or  
 
 

1-second black hole

edit