Welcome, to my wiki page. As a start if you find that you are offended by any objections I might lay out, this is not my intention. Quite often I will take the opposing viewpoint in critiquing an article, whether I agree with that viewpoint or not. I find that taking the opposing side while looking at any article, sharpens a good argument and exposes weaknesses in a bad article. I tend to like very logical arguments.
I believe that a discussion page is for improvement of an article and will not touch article pages without consensus in discussion pages. I also tend to hold that discussion pages should not just rant about veiwpoints, but make logical arguments for improvements to the article. That being said, as discussion pages are not the agreed-upon articles, but meant for discussion, there should be quite a bit of tolerance with respect to the rules in how one presents their argument, so long as that presentation is respectful.