This is the only warning you will receive. If you vandalise Wikipedia once again, as you did to Talk:Kylie Minogue, you will be blocked from editing. --Plek 02:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Issue raised on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents edit

Hello. As a result of your repeated deletion of discussion on Talk:Kylie Minogue, your account and its alleged sockpuppets have now been reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:JJonathan and socks at Talk:Kylie Minogue. You are invited to explain your actions there. Thanks. --Plek 22:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

March 2007 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you will be blocked from editing. Kurt Shaped Box 01:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Please do not blank your talk page. Acalamari 02:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Please do not blank your talk page. This can be considered a form of vandalism, if you remove legitimate warnings. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 11:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

please cite edit

I understand you are just trying to improve Kelly Clarkson's page, but you must cite sources before you add her to a category such as Whistle register singers. Even though her F6 live is common knowledge to idol fans, it still must be cited by a reliable source before you can add her.(see Debelah Morgan's page for a good example of citations) Thankyou AquaMaree 02:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)AquaMareeReply

Spice Girls info box edit

Please stop changing the info box on the Spice Girls article. The group havent reformed and there is no indication that they will.Rimmers 16:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Innosense edit

And for that matter, don't give misleading information about Innosense either. -WarthogDemon 01:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

March 2007 edit

Unsourced POV edit to Alexis Bledel edit

 

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronbo76 02:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

I'm blocked you for 31 hours for you recurring blanking of comments at the tlak page for Kylie Minogue, ex:[1][2]. This would appear to be an ongoing problem for which you have been warned many times, under several accounts. Future occurrences of this activity will result in extended blocks - as will the usage of sockpuppet accounts to avoid blocks. Kuru talk 02:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unconfirmed and already confirmed information edit

Please see the edit summary I left for you. [3] The bands and artists you are adding are either already confirmed artists or are bands that no longer exist. Don't readd it again. — Moe 21:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

And if I see you readd information about the Spice Girls reuniting without sources again I will start giving you vandalism warnings. — Moe 21:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lynsey Bartilson edit

Don't ever do edits like this [4] again. You may think that this is "funny", but it is exactly what gives Wikipedia bad press. And don't believe you are anonymous: [5] --Tilman 06:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kylie Minogue edit

I know you have been warned numerous times, but you need to stop vandalising articles and forcing your edits against consensus. The categorisation of the Kylie Minogue article was discussed on the talk page and you were invited to join the discussion. If you choose not to participate that's your decision, but constantly reverting edits against consensus is considered vandalism and will be treated accordingly. Please start acting like part of a community or your behaviour will continue to be reported. Please note that blanking your talk page is also considered vandalism. Rossrs 07:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.

Blanking edit

Blanking your page won't make your block magically go away. If you intend to contribute usefully, I suggest you change your approach. Friday (talk) 21:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

User:Jon89 edit

Your block has been extended to two weeks for using an alternate account to evade your block. --Chris (talk) 13:58, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/JJonathan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Kurt Shaped Box 00:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deletable Commentary edit

Aww, the poor sockpuppeteer was only trying to improve Wikipedia in his own special way! 142.179.123.133 04:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/JJonathan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Kurt Shaped Box 01:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/JJonathan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Kurt Shaped Box 21:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey you spamming teenybopper edit

Obsessed with Kylie Minogue and other corny pop music much? Stop adding them on the forms!


Ineversigninsodonotmessageme 23:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)IneversigninsodonotmessagemeReply

JJonathan edit

My password is still gone forever becuase I'm the only one that I did it. It's my fault. sorry.--71.190.64.69 19:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply