This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.


January 2022 edit

  1. Devesh: PROD; notified Devesh.bhatta (talk · contribs) 06:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Just a dictionary entry now. There's no particular reason or source to think this name needs an article here.

February 2022 edit

  1. Mohak Bariatrics and Robotics: PROD; notified Edwige9 (talk · contribs) 07:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sources are all routine announcements of operations performed. No in-depth coverage for WP:NCORP found.
  2. Carnival Motion Pictures Private Limited: PROD; notified Mittal G (talk · contribs) 08:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Company page sourced only with routine announcements. No indepth coverage to pass WP:NCORP found.

March 2022 edit

  1. Of Love and Politics: PROD; notified Srivastava.ab (talk · contribs) 10:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: The refs in the article are a series of related articles written by the author of the book himself. I was unable to find anything of substance meeting WP:BOOKCRIT.
  2. The files: PROD; notified Ashwanibigboss (talk · contribs) 08:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Non-notable list with no reliable sourcing.
  3. Labh Singh Ahluwalia: PROD; notified Iqmansh (talk · contribs) 13:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: No reliable source can be found. Current references are all self-sourced profiles or bare mentions.
  4. Deepak Prasadh: PROD; notified Dsp25 (talk · contribs) 07:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
  5. Tej Narayan Agarwal: PROD; notified VirtualBeast (talk · contribs) 02:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Non-notable. References contain mere mentions. An identical draft already exists.

April 2022 edit

  1. Fwa Bagha Re: PROD; notified Vaibhav78545 (talk · contribs) 08:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Apart from Rajyasameeksha, other sources in the article about the song are self-published or unreliable. No reliable sources could be found via search to satisfy WP:NSONG. Searches in Hindi too turned up nothing on which an encyclopedic article could be written.
  2. Rishi Narain: PROD; notified Theamanmisra (talk · contribs) 09:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: India Today ref is the only reliable one in the article and appears to be an interview masked as a profile. Unable to source better coverage on the web, where hits are all either articles authored by him or passing mentions in events organized by him.
  3. Jungo Plus: PROD; notified JoyStick101 (talk · contribs) 11:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Refs are all routine launch announcements. All of them, including The Hindu article, share similar wording; carry extensive quotes of the same insider and do not appear independent. Can't source anything better from searches.
  4. School Chalo Abhiyan: PROD; notified JoyStick101 (talk · contribs) 15:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Routine government program. Coverage is completely limited to announcements. WP:TOOSOON at best.
  5. Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India: PROD; notified Shobhit Gosain (talk · contribs) 16:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: No coverage suitable for WP:NORG found for this run-of-the-mill interest group. Extensive list of search hits are either attributed quotes in auto related articles or routine reports of annual session focusing on the speech of notable invitees.

May 2022 edit

  1. Uday K. Mehta: PROD; notified StyleArt (talk · contribs) 07:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Apart from this interview, all others are passing mentions in articles about movies he was involved with.
  2. Shikhi Sharma: PROD; notified Orlandofoster (talk · contribs) 04:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Coverage around the one book authored by the subject is sparse; I am unable to locate any significant, independent review. Hence WP:NAUTHOR can't be used here. Other search hits aren't independent or significant enough for WP:GNG
  3. Villavan: The Vigilante: PROD; notified Orlandofoster (talk · contribs) 07:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: unable to find two independent reviews from reliable sources for passing WP:NFILM
  4. Rajat Ubhaykar: PROD; notified Orlandofoster (talk · contribs) 07:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Coverage is mostly about the single book he wrote, which isn't enough for WP:NAUTHOR. Refs about UPSC are mostly passing mentions or interviews.
  5. Pledge To Protect: PROD; notified Orlandofoster (talk · contribs) 07:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: The movie appears to have been released, but unable to find any reviews and thus article fails WP:NFILM. The seemingly promotional and low quality references in the article aren't enough for WP:GNG
  6. Saudamini Mishra: PROD; notified Orlandofoster (talk · contribs) 08:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Refs are all interviews or profile pages. Business Standard explicitly says "Marketing Initiative" at the top. Book reviews are from blog-like sites.

June 2022 edit

  1. Manohar Lal Sharma: PROD; notified In ictu oculi (talk · contribs) 12:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Coverage is all about his routine work. Notability of the controversial cases he's taken up does not transfer to the subject himself.
  2. Pragati: PROD; notified Iniwiki (talk · contribs) 17:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: no independent coverage found to satisfy WP:NWEB or WP:NORG for this or its new incarnation at www.thinkpragati.com
  3. Gunasekaran Sundarraj: PROD; notified Guna minature (talk · contribs) 04:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: No independent sources found. Some of the references are to subject's own site; others are blogs or unreliable. The Hindu article is an interview in a city supplement, Tribune is a passing mention among awardee list and the award's notability is not established.
  4. Sahasa Simha Comics Series: PROD; notified Ujjwala21 (talk · contribs) 11:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: All the sources appear to be PR. They are definitely not independent since the content is exclusively author's claims. Unable to find independent coverage per WP:NBOOK.