- Kadyani (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- 221.148.130.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 31 five times in the last 5 minutes (ASCII art, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 Note: Highly suspicious but I'm not sufficiently familiar with the issues related to these filters for me to be comfortable with a block. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- 103.68.23.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1232 (LTA 1232, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: Most likely a false positive. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- 77.29.167.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: Most likely a false positive based on numerous technical edits and no reverts. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit
- 2409:40F4:10F7:1DCF:8000:0:0:0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Dhvani Bhanushali: Vandalizing after block. -Lemonaka 14:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: 2409:40E0:0:0:0:0:0:0/27 is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- 93.66.85.208 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Amarcord (diff): vandalism after final warning. User habitually edits at film articles, particularly those from Italy. Typical edit tends to categorize subject film into hyper-niche genres that are not confirmed in cited sources and results in MOS:SOB. This is not user's only IP account; they have been warned before, but behavior persists. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined. Last reverted edits were two days ago. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1017:B806:9C6E:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – vandalism only. FMSky (talk) 17:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- 198.236.207.215 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) -- vandalism only (1 edit only) Zenon.Lach (talk) 18:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
{{divhide|Usernames for administrator attention}}
User-reported
edit
- Sigma423 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive and disruptive username. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- How is it offensive and disprutive? Secretlondon (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Secretlondon If you know Sigma male and have seen this filter log entry, it might explain why they considered it disruptive. Nobody (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve never heard of sigma male Secretlondon (talk) 14:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Euryalus (talk) 11:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dentium (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username represents the name of a company. This user's only edits have been adding themselves to the requested articles list, not providing sufficient sources to do so. (bojo)(they/them)(talk) 12:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- They've apologised and said they have asked for a rename. Secretlondon (talk) 16:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
-
- Marktranmer (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (marktranmer.com). —Bruce1eetalk 13:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 17:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Since the user claims to be the article subject (Mark Tranmer) in the edit summary I believe this is not a violation. Nobody (talk) 14:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 Question: Does WP:IMPERSONATE apply here? Mark Tranmer redirects to gnac, his pseudonym, so technically we have a BLP article about him. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think this is a username issue as its much more likely to be the subject themselves. Real names are not promotional. Secretlondon (talk) 16:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC){{divhide|end}}
|
