Wikipedia

User:Giantflightlessbirds/Wikipedia for scientists

< User:Giantflightlessbirds
  • NZ Birds Online vs Wikipedia
  • Putting effort into NIWA or DOC information pages: how up-to-date are these? Ask Stella.
  • Wikipedia as an outreach tool
  • Scientists are being encouraged to contribute to Wikipedia[1]
  • Open Access publishing greatly increases the chance findings will show up in Wikipedia.[2]
  • Wikipedia:Wikipedia editing for research scientists

References edit

  1. ^ "Wikipedia calls for more scientists to participate | Scope Blog". Retrieved 2016-01-04.
  2. ^ Teplitskiy, Misha; Lu, Grace; Duede, Eamon (25 June 2015). "Amplifying the Impact of Open Access: Wikipedia and the Diffusion of Science". arXiv. Retrieved 2015-08-06.

Further Reading edit

  • Bateman, Alex; Logan, Darren W. (9 December 2010). "Time to underpin Wikipedia wisdom". Nature. 468 (7325): 765–765. doi:10.1038/468765c.
  • Finn, R. D.; Gardner, P. P.; Bateman, A. (5 December 2011). "Making your database available through Wikipedia: the pros and cons". Nucleic Acids Research. 40 (D1): D9–D12. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1195.
  • Ford, Andrea (19 September 2016). "Wikipedia calls for more scientists to participate". Scope Blog. Link
  • Giles, Jim (15 December 2005). "Internet encyclopaedias go head to head". Nature. 438 (7070): 900–901. doi:10.1038/438900a.
  • Heilman, James (2011). "Why we should all edit Wikipedia". UBC Medical Journal. 3 (1): 32–33.
  • Logan, Darren W.; Sandal, Massimo; Gardner, Paul P.; Manske, Magnus; Bateman, Alex (30 September 2010). "Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia". PLoS Computational Biology. 6 (9): e1000941. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000941.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) Wikipedia:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Giantflightlessbirds/Wikipedia_for_scientists&oldid=698262478"