Duae Quartunciae

This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Duae_Quartunciae.

User name	Duae Quartunciae
Wikiactivity	My contributions, edit-counter
Nationality	Australian
Age	64
Interests	Physics, Cosmology, Religion, and most other things
Blog	Duae Quartunciae

Projects

This user is a participant in WikiProject Physics.

Wikipedia

This user does not understand mean people. Please be nice.

This user assumes good faith.

This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.

This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks.

…in.

Ending a sentence with a preposition is something that this user is okay with.

its & it's

This user understands the difference between its and it's. So should you.

’s

Thi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice.

This user wastes far too much time editing Wikipedia.

Personal

64

This user is 64 years old.

en

This user is a native speaker of the English language.

This user comes from Australia.

This user maintains a blog at Duae Quartunciae.

Trivia

This Wikipedian is based in Newcastle,
New South Wales.

PhD

This user has a Doctor of Philosophy degree in formal logic.

This user is an atheist.

23

This user has visited 23 of the 208 countries in the world.

Visited for a month or more:

Visited for a week or more:

Passed through:

This user is a Go player.

This user is a backgammon player.

This user plays mahjong.

This user enjoys playing blackjack.

(and he counts)

e^{i\pi \ }

This user is a mathematician.

Erdős 5

This user has an Erdős number of 5.

λ

This user is fluent in Lambda calculus.

This user thinks polar coordinates are pretty.

This user enjoys thinking in Four Dimensions.

This user is a skeptic.

This user plays the clarinet.

(very poorly)

This user enjoys singing.

This user enjoys writing.

MONASH

This user is a student or graduate of Monash University.

This user is a student or graduate of
The University of Melbourne

BSc

This user has a Bachelor of Science degree.

C-4

This user is an expert C programmer.

C++

This user can program in C++.

pl

This user can code Prolog.

This user contributes to the template namespace with confidence.

Lisp

(lambda (user)
(setf (lisp-p user) t))

This user is interested in astronomy.

This user accepts evolution as a biological fact.

This user is interested in Paleontology.

This user has a keen interest in physics.

This user has completed a 5k.

This user has completed a 10k.

(in under 32 minutes, 39 years ago)

This user has completed a
half marathon.

This user has completed a marathon.

(long ago, when he was young and stupid)

This user enjoys reading almost anything.

這用戶對中華文化感興趣。
这用户对中华文化感兴趣。
This user is interested in Chinese culture.

ubx-5

This user uses entirely too many userboxes.

Duae Quartunciae is actually the name of my blog, and so people who want to learn more about me can use that as a start for searching. I joined to fix up a problem in an article I saw on wikipedia. I am a long time and very satisfied reader of Wikipedia.

Since I have joined, however, I've become better aware of the nature of the beast. The encyclopedia presents itself to most readers as a general information resource; but just below the surface there is continuous froth and bubble and turbulence, with lots of personal dynamic and conflict and collaboration. The emergent result is not stable or reliable, though it is undoubtedly fascinating and useful. Here be dragons — wise and ancient, also inscrutable, capricious, dangerous.

I currently live in Australia. I have a long time interest in science and mathematics. I have a BSc(Hons) (Melbourne, 1980) and a PhD in formal logic and automata theory (Monash, 1990); but in the topics I pursue in my own time I am basically an amateur. I have a long history of involvement with the talk.origins Usenet group, and the talkorigins website. I am not active there at present. In recent years I have been active on a couple of web forums, and I have just recently started a blog, though it is a bit inactive at present. I have an interest in astronomy and cosmology, and a bit of amateur background in physics.

Convenient links

Help:Table	My sandbox	Templates	Expand templates	math display	Template messages	wikimedia tools

Wikipedia subculture

I'm fascinated by the kinds of subculture that spring up when people interact on line. One aspect of Wikipedia culture, common to all sites that act as a venue for discussion, is a tendency for bad feeling over content to escalate into open animosity. I sometimes hop into contentious topics as well, and will be aiming for that balance between making a firm stand on appropriate content in line with Wikipedia guidelines, and respect for persons who disagree with me on what appropriate content entails.

The other side of Wikipedia subculture is that there is a carefully worked out set of principles intended to guide people in how they manage interactions and content. This has a level of official standing, and contributes a lot to keeping interactions positive.

Another positive thing, less formally organized, is that there is a lot of mutual encouragement that goes on, with random acts of recognition and appreciation. I got an award fairly early in the peace, and it gave me a real buzz of good feeling.

Wikipedia and quality control

I am working on a suggestion for maintaining some level of quality control in wikipedia, without losing the ability for new users to appear out of nowhere and make immediate corrections to problems they see.

Basically, I am thinking of a system of designated reviewers who can check for problems relating to No Original Research, Verifiability, and Neutral Point of View, and flag them in such a way that general readers have some basic level of assurance that what they are reading is unlikely to be badly out of line with those principles.

I'm trying to manage this in such a way nothing much changes for editors; while readers are (by default) given a simple level of filtering that is limited to problem circumstances.

Will it work? I don't know. Feel free to join in and improve or tweak it, or leave a comment. After a while, I may take it up with the appropriate cabal...

See my subpage: /QualityReview.

Wikipedia activity

I have contributed to the following articles:

Fritz Zwicky; significant contributions to the biography of an irascible genius in modern astronomy.
morphogenetic field; added the historical development of an idea in developmental biology. In the process also a fix to Alexander Gurvich.
morphic field; a fringe (pseudoscientific?) idea by Rupert Sheldrake, and a merge with a page on Sheldrake's conception of morphogenetic fields.
Paul Alfred Weiss; a new article; but fairly short. In the process, an addition to Roger Wolcott Sperry.
Alexis Carrel; corrected the background to his claims for a long living culture of cells from a chicken.
Pran Nath; a few additions to the biography.
Robert Sungenis; details surrounding his PhD. In the process, addition to List of unrecognized accreditation associations of higher learning and List of unaccredited institutions of higher learning.
Answers in Genesis; some detail in relation to the dispute with CMI.

I have contributed minor maintenance, mostly by formatting, or giving citations, or reverting inappropriate additions, to the following articles:

I sometimes archive old material in long discussion pages. When I notice it, I remove inappropriate religious additions, especially in articles related to Islam, in line with Manual of Style (Islam-related articles).

I contribute to these dispute resolution boards from time to time, and sometimes try to help out with issue itself. WP:ANI, WP:EAR, and WP:WQA. Here are the links to the recent history of those pages:

Administrator noticeboards: Incidents (and recent history).
Editor assistance requests (and recent history).
Wikiquette alerts (and recent history).
Reference desk: Science (and recent history.

I've also had an invitation to join the Logic project, that I plan to take up eventually. The invitation was from Gregbard 08:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC) originally on my discussion page.

I notice you have expressed an interest in logic. Have you considered joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Logic? It is an effort to coordinate the work of Wikipedians who are knowledgeable about logic in an effort to improve the general quality and range of Wikipedia articles on logic topics. We at the project invite your participation and correspondence. Be well.

Awards

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		Awarded for an astonishing quantity of high-quality work in a number of science and pseudoscience articles. From extensive work on Fritz Zwicky and Morphogenetic field, to working on complex merge proposals and calmly dealing with tenacious editorial conflicts, Duae Quartunciae has made a big impact in a few short few weeks. Kudos. MarcoTolo 01:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For helping me when I felt like the world was against me, for making the difference between staying and going and for all the effort and time put into WP:WQA solving dozens of other problems, I can think of no better recipient for my first barnstar in 2.5 years than Duae Quartunciae! Cheers, CP 15:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! Recognition and encouragement like this is much appreciated, and a nice thing about the Wikipedia subculture.