Hello! I'm Cordelia1898, and on Wikipedia because I find the site useful, like to be helpful and don't like things being obviously wrong (so thus far most of my edits are copyedits or clear factual errors. Except a small editing spree on Jacobite Peerages because it had various points where it was written from an almost "pro-Jacobite" point of view, as it called various English/British monarchs by non-regnal names/titles and explicitly usurpers as if they were such and not recognised as legitimate. That was just odd, but I guess does technically count as factual errors needing to be fixed still? At time of writing nobody has reverted it so presumably it's either sufficiently non-controversial or else the 'Jacobite editor'(s?) is/are not watching the article or no longer editing).
I'm also, as you can see, a somewhat incurable digresser so it's probably a good thing I don't make many content edits yet!