I don't tend to contribute much new material, mostly because I can hardly think of any facts to add to articles here. Generally I just look for vandalism and/or typos while reading and clicking my way through this fascinating accumulation of knowledge, which, given enough free time, I sometimes continue for days on end. I originally created this account so I could mark my spelling corrections as minor edits, but maybe I'll find something of my own to contribute some day. -- Cohen the Bavarian 20:06, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

On WP:TEST I scored 936.47084390825323 points on the non-automated version (revision 59155841), and 194 points on a rather outdated automated version. --Cohen the Bavarian 21:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

More often than not.
This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.