I TEND TO RAMBLE!
EDIT DON'T REVERT
I will never revert a page that has been edited in good faith. If someone has something to say, even if 99% of the populace disagree it probably is still relevant. This is where there is no consensus between wikepedians:
NPOV vs. POV : Actually Wikepedia's policy on Neutrality is rather contradictory to itself and can be read in two ways. 1) Avoid any opinions and include only fact 2} Include all fact, and represent all opinions. Since there is no way to decide which facts are correct and which are mere opinions, the second one seems logical, and unlike other encyclopaedias this one has the added bonus of a discussions page where you can often see nationalistic, local or egoistic pride shine! And form an objective view of your own.
Editing, NOT reverting, is usually the bst way when a big addition has taken place. I bet you can find something worthy in every edit...look hard! Otherwise those trying to Be Bold...will eventually give in! What is the point in constant reverts, a revert war...only one opinion being promulgated! That is not objectivity, nor beneficial.
NATIONALISTIC PRIDE IN ARTICLES IS DAFT
No matter what the old wives tales say..you cannot change historical fact, even with revisionism, the French forces didn't win at Agincourt, Germany did not win world war II, The British Empire didn't ultimitely become a galactic force and Andorra doesn't rule the world!!
You cannot dismiss someone becuase of their birthplace.
My name's Christopher.
I have a degree in history, specialising in European political and Royal from about 400 to 1500 and classical theological history. I have a real interest in pure politics and theology too. These are all pretty intermingled though.
Religiosly, I am an Arian (not Aryan). I keenly embrace the other religions of the world, and I am not opposed to the idea that there was a time before god.
My Contributions, Etc>>>
edit
.svg){kind=small}
