Reviewers will be assigned articles to review. If a reviewer has performed more than minor edits to an article they are assigned or they do not wish to review their assigned article or they are the nominator of the article, they should list that article at the top of the 'To be assigned' section. Each article will be assigned to two reviewers and will be assigned in the order they were nominated. Reviewers will write Pass or Fail next to their assignment, and to pass or fail, and article must have the agreement of both reviewers. If the reviewers disagree, discussion will be started in the 'Discussion' section until a decision is reached. If the decision is Fail, the reviewers need to leave their reason. When reviews are finished, any reviewer can move them to Wikipedia:Version 0.5, Held Nominations, or Archived Nominations as appropriate.
Assignments/Decisions by Article edit
|
Assignments by Reviewer edit
|
To Be Assigned edit
- Aristotle
- Logic
- Football (soccer)
- Computer and video games
- Aquarium
- Crime
- Cannabis (drug)
- Budapest
- Miskolc
- United States
- City
- History of the world
- Industrial Revolution
- Black Death
- Crusade
- British Empire
- The Holocaust
- World War II
- Invasion
- Charlemagne
- Welding
- Technology
- Fixed-wing aircraft
- Computer
- Internet
- Paul Erdős
- John von Neumann
- Blaise Pascal
- Margin of error
- Carl Friedrich Gauss
- Mathematics
- Biology
- Medicine
- Asthma
- Evolution
- Tuberculosis
- Obesity
- Edward Teller
- Eugene Wigner
- Albert Szent-Györgyi
- List of elements by name and/or List of elements by symbol
- Time
- Gravitation
- Energy
- Atom
- Malaria
- Smallpox
- Cholera
- Pneumonia
- Multiple sclerosis
- Breastfeeding
- Action potential
- Tooth enamel
- Prostate cancer
- Blue Whale
- Cerebellum
- Chagas disease
- Coconut crab
- Fauna of Australia
- Gray Wolf
- Frog
- Helicobacter pylori
- History of saffron
- Island fox