User:Bschott/AfD

Article's Creator edit

Example is the article's creator (see Special:Contributions/Example). --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 16:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

:Example is the article's creator (see [[Special:Contributions/Example]]). --~~~~

User's Only Edit edit

This is the user's only edit (see Special:Contributions/Example). --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 16:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

:This is the user's only edit (see [[Special:Contributions/Example]]). --~~~~

User's Only Edit edit

Forged signature by Anon IP Address 127.0.0.1, no such user on Wikipedia. --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 17:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

:Forged signature by [[User:127.0.0.1|Anon IP Address 127.0.0.1]], no such user on Wikipedia --~~~~

Strike Vote Signed User edit

Vote Striken, Example has previously voted. Changed to Comment --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 17:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

:Vote Striken, [[User:Example|Example]] has previously voted. Changed to Comment. --~~~~

Strike Vote, Anon User edit

Vote Striken, Anon user 127.0.0.1 has previously voted. Changed to Comment --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 17:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

:Vote Striken, [[User:127.0.0.1|Anon user 127.0.0.1]] has previously voted. Changed to Comment. --~~~~

Strike Vote, Socks edit

Vote Striken, Anon user 127.0.0.1 has previously voted under forged signature Example. Changed to Comment --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 17:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

:Vote Striken, [[User:127.0.0.1|Anon user 127.0.0.1]] has previously voted under forged signature [[User:Example|Example]]. Changed to Comment --~~~~

Warned on Talk page for Violating WP:CIVIL/WP:PA, Registered and Anon edit

Example has been warned on their Talk page about their uncivil behavior and not to make personal attacks. --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 17:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

: [[User:Example|Example]] has been warned on their [[User:Example/Talk|Talk]] page about their [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil behavior]] and not to make [[WP:PA|personal attacks]]. --~~~~

Anon user 127.0.0.1 has been warned on their Talk page about their uncivil behavior and not to make personal attacks. --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 17:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

:[[User:127.0.0.1|Anon user 127.0.0.1]] has been warned on their [[User:Example/Talk|Talk]] page about their [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil behavior]] and not to make [[WP:PA|personal attacks]]. --~~~~

Warned on Talk page for Vandalism, Registered and Anon edit

Example has vandalized this discussion. They been warned on their Talk page about this behavior. --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 17:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

:[[User:Example|Example]] has vandalized this discussion. They been warned on their [[User:Example/Talk|Talk]] page about this behavior. --~~~~

Anon user 127.0.0.1 has vandalized this discussion. They been warned on their Talk page about this behavior. --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 17:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

:[[User:127.0.0.1|Anon user 127.0.0.1]] has vandalized this discussion. They been warned on their [[User:Example/Talk|Talk]] page about this behavior. --~~~~

Over Dramatic Users complaining about censorship edit

This AfD is not about censoring anything. This is about determining whether or not the subject of the article is (notable/verifiable enough/Not original research) for inclusion in an article of it's own. Suppose I had a friend who wrote a book about wikilawyering. He wouldn't be notable enough for an article of his own, nor would his book be. However, if there was an article on that book about various aspects of wikicommunities, it might have a factoid that reads "Newbies often use repeated, outlandish proposals, often failing to convince the established members of the community. For example, [[User:Wwwwolf|wwwolf]] wrote a book "Wikilawyer for Hire" (2008, O'Ridley & Patrons), where he states (pp. 42-43) that melodramatic polemic is 'the oldest trick ever in Wikipedia AfD debates' and won't win you any friends." See? Facts can exist even when they don't have articles of their own. Hence, comparing this AfD to (censorship/book burning) is silly to say the least. --~~~~

Wikipedia is not a publisher of original information nor is it a free webhost either, as stated in policy. If the history of the website in question is available here but not on the site in question (or some other website that has researched the background of the site), then that is backwards. Wikipedia articles are to cite multiple, Reputable/Reliable, Independent, Third-Party sources who can present 'pre-chewed' pieces of information, and condense that information to something that tells the uninformed people with one glance on what this stuff is about. --~~~~