User:Bollyjeff/MySandbox2

no crore - MOS:COMMONALITY

Template

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

This article has shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria, and is not up to par with other film GAs that I have seen.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Missing sections normally found in film articles, and lead has issues. See WP:MOSFILM.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   More sources are needed. Some failed verification. Very little of the info is backed up by reliable third party sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Not broad at all.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I am unsure if you can use images from IMDB. If you are aware that this has been discussed and approved, please provide a link for me.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold, giving one week to improve the article.

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   This article is a bit lacking in the grammar department. It could use a going over by the WP:GOCE, but it may be just good enough for GA. Try to get another editor to scan it. Lead needs filling out.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The Legacy section seems a bit much for a film of this stature.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Can we get another image in here somehow? Not necessary, but would be appreciated.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold, giving one week to improve the article.