Asphyxiate.always

Wikipedia:Babel ₅

en-5This user can contribute with a professional level of English.

es-2Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel intermedio de español.

en-us
-NThis user is a native speaker of American English.

1337/
IntS !This user understands leet, IM & texting slang, but won't use it. "411 ur LOL pwn ROFLMAO OMG b310ng 2" you, thanks.

BSThis user can speak Bullshit.

LE-0This individual still maintains a shred of dignity in this insane world by adhering to correct spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalisation.

...This user would like to be able to speak many more languages.

sar-NThis user is a native speaker of sarcasm. Isn't that just great?

This user uses Wiktionary as their primary dictionary.

Search user languages

location ₃

This user lives in the U.S. State of Oregon.

This user's time zone is UTC-8.

This user begrudgingly observes Daylight Saving Time.

Professional ₆

=1This user is a Mathematics student with an Erdős number of infinity.

This user is an advanced mathematician.

$\int \limits _{a}^{b}\,$This user knows the difference between an integral and an antiderivative; and so should you!$\int \,$

This user does complex math problems for fun.

met?This user prefers metric units, but, having grown up in the United States, cannot relate to them.

This user is a university student.

This user is a BSc student at university.

MATHThis user's favorite subject is Mathematics.

This user's favorite subject is physics.

This user enjoys the subject of astronomy.

This user's favorite subject is computing.

This user's favourite subject is Chemistry.

This user is an autodidact in a wide range of subjects that they never took in school or college.

This user believes that one should never stop feeding one's brain.

$.{\bar {0}}1$This user believes in the existence of the infinitesimal and can prove its existence.

This user knows that a positron is an electron moving backwards in time. And so should you!

This user is interested in String Theory.

grammar ₇

a lot alotThis user recognizes that linguistic change is a natural and desirable aspect of human language.

…in.Ending a sentence with a preposition is something that this user is okay with.

man-
kindRegarding gender, this user prefers the vernacular, not what is politically correct.

This user employs a more formal style of writing in articles than in talk pages.

they…This user considers singular they standard, modern, informal English usage, so avoids it on Wikipedia.

since

This user dislikes the use of since to mean because.

to
too
twoThis user thinks that too many people have no idea how to use words that they should have learned in grade two.

you oneThis user knows that one should not use "you" in encyclopedia articles or other formal works.

Majority ≠ right

This user recognizes that even if 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's still a mistake.

. TheThis user does not put two spaces after a full stop.

A, B, and CThis user prefers the serial comma.

its & it'sThis user understands the difference between its and it's. So should you.

’sThi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice.

This user terminates unquoted ellipses on sight. This is not your blog. We end sentences properly.

ANAL 4This user advocates good grammar usage.

USage declineThis user uses American English, but is appalled at its rapid and continuing deterioration.

beliefs/prejudices/views ₆

This user is opposed to
political censorship.

This user thanks Richard Stallman and Creative Commons for letting Wikipedia become CC and GFDL dual licensed.

This user is opposed to online censorship.

This editor thinks Wikipedia should readily allow copyrighted images and supports fair use. We should teach and not let copyright stop learning.

This user thinks that Wikipedia has become too bureaucratic.

no
adsThis user is against advertisements on Wikipedia.

Asphyxiate.always believes
there is no cabal.
And actively opposes it.

UARThis editor believes that account creation should not be required on Wikipedia.

This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.

This user knows that replacing one bias with another is not cleanup.

This alleged user can be said to maintain an ill-defined policy or other custom of neutrality or other ambiguity-related quality on some or all issues that may be potentially controversial to some alleged people.

1RRThis user prefers discussing changes on the talk page rather than engaging in an edit war.

This user is pro-cannabis.

This user is a skeptic.

lib	This user is a liberal and doesn't understand why Americans have demonised the word.

This user supports a gold standard.

X

This user does not believe in the existence of human races, except as a social construct.

X

This user believes that anyone who thinks Wikipedia is an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website.

evenThis editor is an eventualist.

personal ₄

This user is male.

This user is owned by one or more cats.

This user believes any universe would be a happier, safer and saner place if there were no religion.

This user is an atheist and fears that religion might have a scary effect on societies.

ANTIThis user opposes religion as a whole.

God made this user an atheist. Do you question his wisdom?

This user is a freethinker.

This users favorite channel is HBO.

UBX₁

ubx-5This user uses entirely too many userboxes.

Hey, I am a Physics/Math student from Oregon. I have a strong belief in neutral point of view being used in any and all Wikipedia articles. I also understand that replacing one bias with another is not helping an article. Anyone who does so shall have their post quickly changed!

I think that my many userboxes should give you a pretty good idea of how I would see any given problem. Also because I am a Physics/Math student, sometimes my grammar isn't 100%, so please forgive me there!