Dispute resolution log (3O) edit

Date Disputed article My assessment Outcome
03 Oct 2007 Dave Hull Unverified opinion; suggested usual WP:V/BLP approach; party who wishes to keep it must provide sources and rewrite it accordingly; otherwise, it should be removed
10 Sep 2007 Justin King Recommended that WP:V's procedure for settling disputes about unreferenced material should be followed Other party came up with the requested verification; agreement was (largely) reached
26 Aug 2007 Docklands Light Railway Assertions, credential-based claims and OR are trumped by reliable independent sources. Recommended compromise only if a counter-source is provided. Editor reverted against consensus at least 15 times; numerous editors intervened; I posted at AN3; he got blocked.
18 Aug 2007 Field Commander Recommended usual procedure for WP:V/WP:RS disputes; edit or remove contested material if no suitable source is forthcoming Editor continually reverted the removal of the contested content and was threatened with a block for 3RR. Article is now stable.
04 Aug 2007 User talk:Poggibonsi Dealt with belated complaint about a revert made five months ago; supported the revert and explained why it was correct. As expected; no response.
01 Aug 2007 Sole (foot) Agreed that only one image is worthwhile at this time; potential for other more specific images with expansion of the article. Received thanks from requesting editor; other party objected, but a fourth party supported my opinion.
30 Jul 2007 Jenin, Jenin Suggested that the quote be kept but given less visual weight by incorporating it fully into body text. No feedback forthcoming.
28 Jul 2007 Walid Eido Blogs are not normally reliable sources; reliable sources are needed for contended material. No feedback forthcoming.
19 Jul 2007 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Cited discussion at WT:V and agreed with its consensus; suggested informal mediation if necessary, but probably won't be needed. Editors found agreement; decided to add only material that met WP:V via reliable sources.
18 Jul 2007 Alcoholics Anonymous
User talk:Craigtalbert
Provided advice at user's talk page to guide his efforts to uphold talk page guidelines. Editor has added new headers and left a request to all concerned to keep on topic.
09 Jul 2007 Kentucky Fried Chicken Agreed that one of the "See Also" links was not suitable; suggested a compromise by keeping the other link, with rationale for doing so. Editor who requested 3O could not accept compromise and sulked off.
07 Jul 2007 List of Romanian actors Suggested solution to deal with unverified content; concurred with editor who is applying WP:V. Editor worked hard to fulfill his own request by cleaning up the article and finding sources.
29 Jun 2007 Wisconsin Badgers Reverted edit is noteworthy, relevant and well sourced; suggested that it should be included. Both editors happy with outcome.
10 Jun 2007 Podilsko-Voskresenska Line Provisionally supported keeping the disputed content in light of background info; other editors provided further evidence for and against; difficult to call. Two parties could not agree; went to mediation.
09 Jun 2007 Loyola Law School Backed up 3O from first respondent; third and fourth respondents concurred. Repeated failure by other party to respect policy and consensus until fourth respondent arrived.
08 Jun 2007 Mega Man ZX characters Avoid speculation and handle with care. No feedback but no further dispute.
08 Jun 2007 Asian Americans Recommended RFC N/A
06 Jun 2007 William Remington Leave out or modify the statement. Editor who made 3O request proved problematic.
27 May 2007 Keyboard concerto Expand extensively before de-merging. Other 3O providers largely concurred.
26 May 2007 Westerley Cycling Club Cannot be speedied. SD nomination removed by a third party.
17 May 2007 Snowshoe Reduced disputed gallery to the best two images. Editors agreed and edit war ceased.
03 May 2007 Turbocharger Material must be verified by reliable sources. Third party appeared, in support of the poorly sourced material.
28 Apr 2007 Justin Guarini Template should be used for consistency; no reason not to do so. Editor remained civil and eventually accepted consensus.
05 Apr 2007 The Profit Link to Banned films as long as the nature of the injunction is clear. Editors agreed.