This redirect is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I propose that this template, along with Template: Scientists whose names are used as non SI units, is merged into Template:Scientists whose names are used as units. It's quite clunky having two templates and the connection is just the same. As was pointed out in the recent deletion debate, many of the entries do not have a close connection with the SI system other than the use of the name. The connection between them is through being honoured in this way and the system in use at the time is not really relevant. In fact, some entries, such as Kelvin/Stokes have a close connection but are on different templates. SpinningSpark 12:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
As no one has responded to this, I will assume that it is uncontroversial and carry this out in the next few days. SpinningSpark 18:29, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply