Template talk:Infobox historic subdivision
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Roger 8 Roger in topic Inconsistent fields
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Template:Infobox former subdivision Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Template talk:Infobox former subdivision |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This template was considered for deletion on 5 July 2013. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
 | The contents of the Template:Infobox historic subdivision page were merged into Template:Infobox former subdivision on 22 September 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
New fields for captions edit
I've added fields to split captions from images. They are image_caption, map_caption, arms_caption, civic_caption and divisions_map_caption. MRSC (talk) 09:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Motto edit
Is there any good reason for the forced display in all upper case of entries made in this field? -- Picapica (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Inconsistent fields edit
Start displays Created, End displays Abolished. These are not the same and should be altered. I suggest Start displays Start, End displays End Roger 8 Roger (talk) 22:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)