Template talk:Infobox historic site

WikiProject iconInfoboxes
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconHistoric sites Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Not sure why param 6s are not working edit

I recently added all the parameters to support a sixth designation. But they are not appearing on pages. See for example Statue of Liberty. Does anyone have any ideas? Ergo Sum 19:33, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 5 August 2023 edit

Adding 'event' and 'associated people' parameters

Hello! I'm just wondering if it would be possible to add the above parameters, both of which are inspired by Template:Infobox military installation. 'Event' would allow editors to list any notable events which took place at a site, and 'associated people' would allow the same for notable people. For example, a castle infobox might list a major siege and a famous castellan. The exact names of the parameters don't matter, feel free to suggest alternatives.

On a separate note, templates which use 'native name' or similar rarely bother to subtitle the section as it's typically obvious from the context that any alternative name is from another language (example). Does this template therefore need the "Native name" subtitle?

I would lay all this out in wikitext but I'm not particularly good with templates, apologies. Thank you, A.D.Hope (talk) 09:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The addition of two parameters and deletion of one parameter requires a consensus to put into effect. Please garner a consensus before reactivation of this request. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 01:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
What should I do when nobody seems interested in forming a consensus? This discussion was opened 17 days ago and hasn't attracted any input besides yours. A.D.Hope (talk) 08:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The consensus link presents editors with options, for example, starting an RFC discussion will often attract editors and result in consensus. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 09:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'd support the addition, and I don't think it's controversial enough to require an RfC. ɱ (talk) 15:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 20 October 2023 Location Map Label + Map Mark Size edit

Description of suggested change: add Template:Location_map label and label parameters, and mark size parameter, currently they are not available, no label parameter available. Ideally add all Location Map parameters to template.

Diff:

ORIGINAL_TEXT
+
CHANGED_TEXT

KarmaKangaroo (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Already done See the documentation, where the |locmapin= and related parameters are explained. To see an example of how they are used, look at the infobox at State Thomas, Dallas. I have added documentation for |map_dot_label=. For a mark size option, there should probably be a discussion about allowing non-standard sizing. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply