Template talk:Infobox high court

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Colin M in topic This template vs. {{Infobox court}}
WikiProject iconLaw Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Session / Term edit

I would like to add a field for the court session or term length e.g. the Supreme Court of the US has a term from the First Monday in October to the Preceading Day the next year.[1] This is broadly applicable. So without objections I will add this on Monday, 2009-01-05

Awg1010 (talk) 02:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

No objection, just please make sure that it is optional to keep the infobox as broadly applicable as possible. Thanks. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


I'm not sure how to test the changes so please check my work. In the main part of the code, below terms, insert the following four lines:
|-
{{#if:{{{session|<noinclude>-</noinclude>}}} |
{{!}} '''Dates of court sessions:'''   {{!}}{{!}} {{{session}}}
}}

In the Empty Syntax section, below terms, insert the next line:

|session = <!--start and end dates of court sessions-->

Awg1010 (talk) 02:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

2nd chief judge edit

I was thinking if a second chief judge parameter could be added, if the court has 2 heads, or 1 head and 1 deputy, the Court of Appeal in England has the Lord Chief Justice and Master of the Rolls, the UK Supreme Court has its President and Deputy President.--Tærkast (Discuss) 11:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Anybody? --Tærkast (Discuss) 16:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

This template vs. {{Infobox court}} edit

In light of the existence of {{Infobox court}}, is this template necessary? The two templates take almost exactly the same parameters (only differences: high court has an additional country parameter, and court allows a second image, a division map, and a third chief judge). High court has 375 transclusions whereas court has only 95, but I would suggest consolidating on court because of its more generic name. Colin M (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply