This template is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuitaristsWikipedia:WikiProject GuitaristsTemplate:WikiProject Guitaristsguitarist articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Doesn't Naked City deserve a higher rung in the "bands" section? - Steve3849talk 06:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
To answer my own question I see the first tier are all early bands, the second tier are bands he led and thus leaving the third tier. Naked City is most often thought of a John Zorn and then guitar (Frith's forte) is Bill Frisell. Still, his contribution there is noteworthy... maybe the third rung could be a larger font size? - Steve3849talk 06:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Tiers one and two are for bands Frith led or was a founding member of, tier one being those bands he is best known for. The third tier is for other bands he was simply a member of, like John Zorn's Naked City, and hence the smaller font. --Bruce1ee 10:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've removed "Collaborating artists" from the template. Frith has collaborated with many artists and even if we include only the prominent ones, it would still be a long list. I don't know of any other musician templates that use "Collaborating artists" and, particularly because of the number of possible entries here, I feel it's better to leave it off. —Bruce1eetalk 12:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)Reply