This template is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Most of the articles are found in the list now, thus the navigation template is not really necessary. I suggest deleting it until we do need it. -- ReyBrujo 17:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
It's roughly a 1:3 ratio of gods with articles to those on the list. Yeah, we can probably get rid of this, however the family tree one can still be useful. DoomsDay349 00:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
If this is kept, why is Mina listed as a disputed god if the denouement of the plot revealed that she is, in fact, a deity? Banaticus 20:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
It was disputed because we're unsure on what her alignment is, not if she's a god. But that was unclear, yeah, so putting her in other is best. Amber and Blood, which sadly is gonna take about a year, will reveal the truth. DoomsDay349 21:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
