This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles
This template is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
If we're going to make this the stub template for all California road types, like county, US, Interstate and State, then we should either make it shield neutral or include all 4 shield types in the template. Gateman1997 02:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
This is not for Interstate or U.S. Routes- those are covered by another stub. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Then why are we covering County routes with it? Gateman1997 02:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
The purpose of the stub is to sort by state, not by road type. It is up to WP:WSS how we do things. master sonT - C 02:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well then we should put the shield of the route types it covers in the template. Gateman1997 02:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
