Template talk:BlackBerry

Learn more about this page

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Telecommunications

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles

Companies

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Canada

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles

Requested move edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

IMO the scope of this template should be expanded to cover RIM products or RIM in general. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:39, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sure, why not, when I first started the template I had ideas along the same lines, but I'm not that familar with the RIM ecosystem of products and services.—IncidentFlux ^{[ TalkBack | Contributions ]} 07:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't sound controversial. Just need to decide how big the universe of RIM-related articles is for the near-term to figure out the target. Is there going to be just RIM itself and its products, or are there lots of RIM-related issues other than "just the company" and "its products"? DMacks (talk) 02:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've removed this discussion from the WP:RM backlog, since a) the move isn't controversial and b) the move doesn't need admin intervention. Cheers!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 16:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Would it be okay to rename this template? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm hoping to make this template more of a centerpiece of the RIM/BlackBerry articles. Would anyone be against renaming this? I was thinking something more like: "BlackBerry", "BlackBerry platform", "BlackBerry Operating System", or just "Research in Motion"(My personal favourite). I'm thinking this because it has indeed expanded beyond the "RIM Phones" realm. I feel we might as well include things like QNX? Especially as it was recently bought-out by RIM. Keep in mind RIM is working on other things like tablets, so the existing name doesn't fit RIM's overall product portfolio now anyway.

I encourage everyone to help in this discussion. I don't want to ruffle any feathers as a newcomer, yet I want to get more collaboration going on this article and its related topics. Thank You. CaribDigita (talk) 20:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic