Template:WikiProject Reliability/testcases


Test1
{{WikiProject Reliability |category=no |namespace=talk |reliability=generally reliable |rsp=Ars Technica}}

{{WikiProject Reliability}}

WikiProject iconReliability
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

{{WikiProject Reliability/sandbox}}

WikiProject iconReliability
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Test2
{{WikiProject Reliability |category=no |namespace=talk}}

{{WikiProject Reliability}}

WikiProject iconReliability
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

{{WikiProject Reliability/sandbox}}

WikiProject iconReliability
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Test3
{{WikiProject Reliability |category=no |discussion1=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248#RfC: Breitbart |discussion10=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 190#UPDATE: Breitbart Global News Syndicate - Reliability Dispute |discussion11=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 182#Breitbart again |discussion2=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 300#Citing breitbart.com for their "Never Trump" opinion |discussion3=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 268#Breitbart as a source for criticism of Wikipedia |discussion4=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 265#Breitbart News ... but hear me out |discussion5=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 231#Should Breitbart articles be given talkpage PRESS templates |discussion6=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 216#Breitbart News |discussion7=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 211#Is Breitbart.com reliable? |discussion8=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 208#Use of Breitbart on Alt-right |discussion9=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 199#Is Breitbart reliable for its own opinion. |discussions=yes |namespace=talk |reliability=deps |rfc=yes |rsp=Breitbart News |status2=spb}}

{{WikiProject Reliability}}

WikiProject iconReliability
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

{{WikiProject Reliability/sandbox}}

WikiProject iconReliability
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Test case: Ars Technica edit

Test case: The Babylon Bee edit